Skip to main content

Government blitz on “disruptive roadworks” causing traffic jams in UK

Consultation may increase fines for companies whose street works overrun
By David Arminas January 17, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
“Too often traffic jams are caused by overrunning street works,” said Guy Opperman, the UK’s roads minister (image: Department for Transport)

The UK government has launched a consultation on further proposals to prevent utility companies from letting roadworks overrun and create traffic jams.

There is already a £10,000 per day fine for companies whose street works overrun on weekdays. The proposals would extend this from weekdays into weekends and national holidays.

The announcement concerning “disruptive roadworks” came on the UK’s annual so-called National Pothole Day. The consultation is part of a series of measures from the government’s Plan for Drivers, a 30-point document to support people’s freedoms to use their cars and curb over-zealous enforcement measures meant to curtail vehicle use.

The government said that the two million street works carried out in England by gas, water and other utility companies during 2022-23 have cost the economy around £4 billion through severe road congestion and disrupted journeys.

“Too often traffic jams are caused by overrunning street works,” said Guy Opperman, the roads minister. “This government is backing drivers, with a robust approach to utility companies and others, who dig up our streets. We will seek to massively increase fines for companies that breach conditions and fine works that overrun into weekends and bank holidays, while making the rental for such works help generate up to an extra £100 million to improve local roads.”

The consultation comes after the government introduced a performance-based “street works regime” to ensure utility companies resurface roads to the best possible standard and new lane rental schemes where utility companies can be charged up to £2,500 per day for street works.

The measures can also help boost active travel by preventing street works from disrupting walking, wheeling and cycling, while also providing opportunities to improve pavements and pedestrian crossings and make repairs to pavements and cycle lanes.

The proposals could also double fines from £500 up to a maximum of £1,000 for companies which breach conditions of the job, such as working without a permit.

The government plans would also direct at least half the money from lane rental schemes towards improving roads and repairing potholes. Lane rental schemes allow local highway authorities to charge companies for the time that street and road works occupy the road.

As a result, the measures could generate up to £100 million extra over 10 years to resurface roads.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • TRA 2018: Vienna conference highlights
    June 5, 2018
    Digitalisation of transport systems, the regulation of new technologies and more charging points for electric vehicles in cities were among the talking points at this year’s Transport Research Arena conference. Alan Dron sifts through the highlights in Vienna. More than 3,000 transport sector specialists converged on TRA 2018, where the four-day event’s agenda included scores of topics covering regulation, technology and the effect of the digitalisation of road transport systems. Who should control those
  • Pedestrians still walking a tightrope in US
    August 23, 2024
    Although the Governors Highway Safety Association says annual US pedestrian traffic deaths fell for first time since Covid, they remain above pre-pandemic levels, finds David Arminas
  • IBTTA: road user charge is the future
    March 16, 2022
    The US government’s cash injection for the nation’s bridges represents a step forward – but IBTTA’s Pat Jones suggests that states need to consider the benefits of road usage charging
  • Should it be end of the road for right-turns on red?
    April 10, 2024
    Banning right-hand turns after stopping for a red light is gaining momentum in the US. But the debate continues about whether it will result in fewer incidents between vehicles and alternative mobility users. David Arminas reports