Skip to main content

Gig economy drivers and riders at increased risk of collisions, warns UCL

Self-employed courier or taxi drivers who get their work through apps could be more likely to be involved in a collision, says a new study. The University College London (UCL) research found 63% of ‘gig’ economy respondents – who are not paid a salary - are not provided with safety training about managing risks on the road. The emerging issues for management of occupational road risk in a changing economy: A survey of gig economy drivers, riders and their managers also revealed 65% of drivers did not
September 3, 2018 Read time: 3 mins
Self-employed courier or taxi drivers who get their work through apps could be more likely to be involved in a collision, says a new study.


The University College London (UCL) research found 63% of ‘gig’ economy respondents – who are not paid a salary - are not provided with safety training about managing risks on the road.

The emerging issues for management of occupational road risk in a changing economy: A survey of gig economy drivers, riders and their managers also revealed 65% of drivers did not receive safety equipment such as a high visibility vests.

More than two in five drivers and riders report their vehicle had been damaged in a collision while working – and 8% of respondents said they were also injured.

For the study, Dr Nicola Christie and Heather Ward (UCL 8447 Centre for Transport Studies) carried out 48 qualitative, in-depth interviews with drivers, riders and their managers, and analysed 200 responses to an online survey taken by drivers and riders. The participants included couriers who deliver parcels and food and self-employed taxi drivers.

The document revealed 40% of those using an app found them to be a distraction while driving or riding.

According to UCL, most of the motorbike, moped and scooter courier participants report that the app they use is a distraction as it plays a noise to alert them to a job and provides them with a fixed window to accept it.

“Several participants alluded to personal and third-hand knowledge of security risks including being attacked, acid attacks and bike theft,” the report states.

UCL says other risks to gig economy drivers include tiredness – particularly among parcel couriers – from overwork as participants have admitted they are more likely to take risks such as speeding or jumping red lights to save time.

For the online survey, nearly half of respondents admitted to speeding, two-thirds parked illegally and a third had driven or ridden through a red light.

Ward says the number of hours these drivers need to work and the distances they must travel to earn a stable income increases as more workers enter the economy.

“We know this is an issue but don’t know exactly how far it extends, as not all companies need to report the number of self-employed couriers they use to the government.”

UCL recommends introducing time blocks for couriers to sign up and be paid for, rather than a drop rate. It adds that if drop rates are used they should consider the time taken to travel safely within the speed limit and to carry out tasks such as scanning parcels and obtaining signatures.

Additionally, the document stresses that mobile phones require handling to accept and reject jobs while driving and less distracting interfaces need to be developed by the industry.

Meanwhile, UCL suggests a person within a company should be responsible for managing safety of the people who provide an income for them.  

Christie says: “I hope to see the recommendations in this report taken on board by the 1837 Department for Transport and incorporated into health and safety regulations as the gig economy is set to continue to increase”.

A full copy of the report is available on the %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external website false http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0818/200818-gig-economy-drivers-traffic-collisions false false%>.

UTC

Related Content

  • October 15, 2018
    Irdeto opens C/AV office in Michigan to boost OEM collaboration
    Irdeto has opened an office in Pontiac, Michigan, to encourage collaboration with original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), automotive suppliers and fleet operators on improving security for connected and autonomous vehicles (C/AVs). Niels Haverkorn, general manager, connected transport, Irdeto, says: “The key challenge is to identify a comprehensive security solution that is able to protect the vehicle itself and safely implement innovative business models.” The move follows a previous initiative where
  • October 9, 2018
    Ride-hailing companies could face taxes in San Francisco
    Ride-hailing companies could be taxed for starting their journeys in San Francisco following a bill signed by California governor Jerry Brown. The bill - AB 1184 - calls for a 3.25% tax on net rider fares for single-party trips, or those provided by an autonomous vehicle, as well as a 3.25% tax on shared rides. Additionally, the city or county would be able to set a lower tax rate for net rider fares for those provided by a lower emission vehicle. A report by the San Francisco Chronicle says the
  • March 27, 2019
    UK reviews MaaS, data and micromobility regulation
    Mobility as a Service (MaaS), transport data and micromobility are to be the subject of new regulatory review by the UK government. Zero-emission vehicles, driverless vehicles (AVs) and drones are already under similar review. But in a document, Future of Mobility: Urban Strategy, maps out how the country’s Department of Transport will approach other mobility opportunities – and challenges. “This is the moment to reflect on what we as a society want these changes to deliver and what we want our urban
  • December 22, 2017
    European Court of Justice rules Uber as a Transport service
    The European Court of Justice has ruled against Uber, concluding it to be a transport service, which will require it to have stricter regulation and licensing as a taxi operator within the EU. The decision follows a challenge presented by taxi drivers in Barcelona who were seeking a declaration from a court in 2014 that activities of Uber Systems Spain, amounted to misleading practices and acts of unfair competition.