Skip to main content

Gig economy drivers and riders at increased risk of collisions, warns UCL

Self-employed courier or taxi drivers who get their work through apps could be more likely to be involved in a collision, says a new study. The University College London (UCL) research found 63% of ‘gig’ economy respondents – who are not paid a salary - are not provided with safety training about managing risks on the road. The emerging issues for management of occupational road risk in a changing economy: A survey of gig economy drivers, riders and their managers also revealed 65% of drivers did not
September 3, 2018 Read time: 3 mins
Self-employed courier or taxi drivers who get their work through apps could be more likely to be involved in a collision, says a new study.


The University College London (UCL) research found 63% of ‘gig’ economy respondents – who are not paid a salary - are not provided with safety training about managing risks on the road.

The emerging issues for management of occupational road risk in a changing economy: A survey of gig economy drivers, riders and their managers also revealed 65% of drivers did not receive safety equipment such as a high visibility vests.

More than two in five drivers and riders report their vehicle had been damaged in a collision while working – and 8% of respondents said they were also injured.

For the study, Dr Nicola Christie and Heather Ward (UCL 8447 Centre for Transport Studies) carried out 48 qualitative, in-depth interviews with drivers, riders and their managers, and analysed 200 responses to an online survey taken by drivers and riders. The participants included couriers who deliver parcels and food and self-employed taxi drivers.

The document revealed 40% of those using an app found them to be a distraction while driving or riding.

According to UCL, most of the motorbike, moped and scooter courier participants report that the app they use is a distraction as it plays a noise to alert them to a job and provides them with a fixed window to accept it.

“Several participants alluded to personal and third-hand knowledge of security risks including being attacked, acid attacks and bike theft,” the report states.

UCL says other risks to gig economy drivers include tiredness – particularly among parcel couriers – from overwork as participants have admitted they are more likely to take risks such as speeding or jumping red lights to save time.

For the online survey, nearly half of respondents admitted to speeding, two-thirds parked illegally and a third had driven or ridden through a red light.

Ward says the number of hours these drivers need to work and the distances they must travel to earn a stable income increases as more workers enter the economy.

“We know this is an issue but don’t know exactly how far it extends, as not all companies need to report the number of self-employed couriers they use to the government.”

UCL recommends introducing time blocks for couriers to sign up and be paid for, rather than a drop rate. It adds that if drop rates are used they should consider the time taken to travel safely within the speed limit and to carry out tasks such as scanning parcels and obtaining signatures.

Additionally, the document stresses that mobile phones require handling to accept and reject jobs while driving and less distracting interfaces need to be developed by the industry.

Meanwhile, UCL suggests a person within a company should be responsible for managing safety of the people who provide an income for them.  

Christie says: “I hope to see the recommendations in this report taken on board by the 1837 Department for Transport and incorporated into health and safety regulations as the gig economy is set to continue to increase”.

A full copy of the report is available on the %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external website false http://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/news-articles/0818/200818-gig-economy-drivers-traffic-collisions false false%>.

UTC

Related Content

  • August 15, 2019
    Detroit introduces unified bus payment system
    Detroit authorities have launched a ticketing scheme to encourage bus ridership – a new venture which dovetails with existing initiatives to improve mobility, Ben Spencer reports The Detroit Department of Transportation (DDoT) has partnered with the Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) to launch a unified payment system – called Dart - for the US region’s buses. Detroit’s mayor Mike Duggan says: “Dart will bring our two systems closer together with seamless transfers and more f
  • July 23, 2019
    How C/AVs could serve rural communities
    In Ireland, there is low population density and a lot of rain – which can make last-mile journeys a trial. Orla O’Halloran at Arup has some thoughts on how C/AVs could serve rural communities Connected and autonomous vehicles (C/AVs) have the potential to be a vital link for people in rural communities, as part of a wider Mobility as a Service (MaaS) solution. That is the view of Orla O’Halloran, intelligent mobility consultant at Arup. She believes that MaaS needs to be considered in conjunction with ot
  • May 22, 2018
    San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge toll increases 25 cents
    Motorists travelling over San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge are set to pay an extra 25 cents per trip from 1 July. According to a report by Marin Independent Journal: “The onslaught of toll increases at the Golden Gate Bridge is not likely to subside as span authorities face looming budget deficits.” The bridge board will need to decide if more toll hikes are needed in a discussion scheduled for this autumn.
  • November 28, 2012
    Canadian authorities convinced of enforcement safety benefits
    Cost-benefit analysis invariably finds highly in favour of speed and red light enforcement, particularly so in Edmonton in the Alberta province of Canada, where authorities need no convincing of the merits of road safety engineering. Justification of enforcement efforts on economic grounds has been reinforced this year, by a study of the costs and benefits of red light enforcement. New York-based economic research firm John Dunham & Associates carried out this latest analysis for American Traffic Solutions