Skip to main content

Flashing LEDs may cut ‘distracted walking’ risk

Flashing LED lights embedded into pavements could improve the safety of pedestrians distracted by their phones, says Australia’s Queensland University of Technology (QUT).
By Ben Spencer March 24, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
QUT reckons flashing LED lights could help solve distracted walking (© Irstone | Dreamstime.com)

Chief investigator Dr Gregoire Larue says mobile phone distraction is a global road safety concern - but most research and safety campaigns are focused on distracted driving. 

“There are now growing concerns about ‘distracted walking’, particularly pedestrian distraction from looking down at mobile phones,” he says.

The Brisbane study set out to break the ‘smartphone spell’ by assessing whether or not flashing LED lights at ground level caught the attention of pedestrians engrossed in their apps. 

QUT’s Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety - Queensland (CARRS-Q) brought 24 participants between 20-43 years old into their labs. They were fitted with eye trackers, handed a phone with a visually-intensive task and asked to walk a pavement and push a button whenever they noticed the LED lights. 

“We also performed the same test with headphones and an auditory version of the task - as listening to music and voices through headphones can also be distracting and reduces people’s ability to hear warnings,” he adds. 

The study found that participants used their peripheral vision to detect the flashing lights at ground level while carrying out a distracting task on their phone.

“Reaction time for ground lights (compared to eye level lights) improved by 159 milliseconds for lights one metre away, and 43 milliseconds for lights two metres away,” Dr Larue continues.  “It’s only a tiny amount of time but it can be the difference between life and death if you are crossing the road.”

He explains that ground level flashing lights were just as successful at catching people’s attention as face level lights are for people not on their phones, but the fastest response times happened when the participants were one metre from the lights. 

“This is consistent with close-range peripheral vision and existing research that shows walkers tend to fixate on the ground around one or two steps ahead,” he reveals. 

Dr Larue concluded that further research in the field is needed to see if the results were the same as in a laboratory setting. 

 

UTC

Related Content

  • June 9, 2015
    VMS can counter small screens’ big problems
    Lacroix Trafic’s Steve Collins believes the improving trends in road safety could go into reverse unless authorities make full use of the latest LED technology to meet drivers’ information needs. Road authorities and vehicles manufacturers could and should be far more active in countering some of the transportation industry’s major problems, according to Steve Collins export sales director at Lacroix Trafic.
  • June 3, 2015
    Distraction dominated teen driver accident causes.
    As a new report shows that distracted driving is a bigger cause of accidents than previously thought, Jon Masters asks what should be done to counter this problem. Research carried out by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety has shed new light on the dangers of distraction for teen drivers. Six years of study using video analysis has shown that 58% of all crashes involving teen drivers are caused by the driver being distracted and proved that the influence of external factors is stronger than previously th
  • March 29, 2017
    Technology solution needed to counter mobile phone menace
    With the UK set to increase the penalties for using mobile phones while driving, the RAC Foundation’s Steve Gooding considers what else can be done to combat this deadly distraction. The first mobile phone call was made in 1973, by an engineer working for Motorola. Today 4.7 billion people across the globe subscribe to a mobile service.
  • September 18, 2013
    Stronger penalties needed for texting drivers says IAM
    Drivers convicted of causing death by dangerous driving should be given stronger and more consistent penalties, according to road safety charity the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM). An IAM analysis of eleven recent prosecutions involving mobile and smartphone use revealed that the average sentence for causing death by dangerous driving is four-and-a-half years in prison and a disqualification from driving for seven years. In all of the cases analysed, the convicted drivers were found to have lost the