Skip to main content

Flashing LEDs may cut ‘distracted walking’ risk

Flashing LED lights embedded into pavements could improve the safety of pedestrians distracted by their phones, says Australia’s Queensland University of Technology (QUT).
By Ben Spencer March 24, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
QUT reckons flashing LED lights could help solve distracted walking (© Irstone | Dreamstime.com)

Chief investigator Dr Gregoire Larue says mobile phone distraction is a global road safety concern - but most research and safety campaigns are focused on distracted driving. 

“There are now growing concerns about ‘distracted walking’, particularly pedestrian distraction from looking down at mobile phones,” he says.

The Brisbane study set out to break the ‘smartphone spell’ by assessing whether or not flashing LED lights at ground level caught the attention of pedestrians engrossed in their apps. 

QUT’s Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety - Queensland (CARRS-Q) brought 24 participants between 20-43 years old into their labs. They were fitted with eye trackers, handed a phone with a visually-intensive task and asked to walk a pavement and push a button whenever they noticed the LED lights. 

“We also performed the same test with headphones and an auditory version of the task - as listening to music and voices through headphones can also be distracting and reduces people’s ability to hear warnings,” he adds. 

The study found that participants used their peripheral vision to detect the flashing lights at ground level while carrying out a distracting task on their phone.

“Reaction time for ground lights (compared to eye level lights) improved by 159 milliseconds for lights one metre away, and 43 milliseconds for lights two metres away,” Dr Larue continues.  “It’s only a tiny amount of time but it can be the difference between life and death if you are crossing the road.”

He explains that ground level flashing lights were just as successful at catching people’s attention as face level lights are for people not on their phones, but the fastest response times happened when the participants were one metre from the lights. 

“This is consistent with close-range peripheral vision and existing research that shows walkers tend to fixate on the ground around one or two steps ahead,” he reveals. 

Dr Larue concluded that further research in the field is needed to see if the results were the same as in a laboratory setting. 

 

UTC

Related Content

  • November 3, 2015
    New hands-free technologies pose hidden dangers for drivers
    Potentially unsafe mental distractions can persist for as long as 27 seconds after dialling, changing music or sending a text using voice commands, according to surprising new research by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety. The results raise new and unexpected concerns regarding the use of phones and vehicle information systems while driving. This research represents the third phase of the Foundation’s comprehensive investigation into cognitive distraction, which shows that new hands-free technologies ca
  • October 17, 2016
    Two seconds – the difference between life and death
    Professor Donald Fisher has spent 15 years identifying factors that increase the crash risk of novice and older drivers. His findings highlight the difference between living and dying, Colin Sowman reports.
  • April 2, 2020
    Distraction danger rises with in-car tech, says TRL
    The increasing sophistication of in-car technology is creating new dangers in terms of driver distraction, a new study finds.
  • February 15, 2024
    Prowag signals change to vision statement
    New pedestrian signal requirements designed to make crossings safer for the visually impaired mean that accessible signals are no longer just an option for US cities and municipalities. They now have the backing of the law, explains Andrew Stone