Skip to main content

Ex-USDoT bosses urge Congress to reauthorise Fast 

The Metropolitan Civic Leadership Alliance is calling on US Congress to reauthorise the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (Fast) Act which is set to expire this autumn. 
By Ben Spencer March 25, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
US alliance calls on Congress to reauthorise Fast Act (© William Perry | Dreamstime.com)

The Fast Act is a decade-long commitment to provide funding for surface transportation infrastructure planning and investment. It authorised $305 billion for highway and motor vehicle safety, public transportation from 2016-20. 
 
Ray LaHood, US Department of Transportation (USDoT) secretary from 2009-13, says: “Reauthorisation is an opportunity to fundamentally improve how our nation invests in transportation. Metropolitan regions are our nation’s economic engines. To remain competitive, they need a strong federal infrastructure investment programme.”
 
Civic organisations within the alliance - which include the Bay Area Council and Civic Committee of Commercial Club of Chicago - sent a letter to Congress outlining a platform for a transportation package that would reward high-capacity regions with greater funding and flexibility.
 
Sam Skinner, who was USDoT secretary from 1989-91, says: “We need to build on previous generations’ investments in our roads, rail and transit. By making federal funding more flexible and targeting it to metropolitan areas, we will be able to leverage innovation and get more out of every dollar spent.”
 
The letter claimed US Congress and USDoT are increasingly limiting competition to less populated states or rural areas and that grant programmes should not be off-limits to large metropolitan areas. 
 
It recognised that cities and regions can help achieve national transportation goals in areas such as congestion and air quality improvement when they can access federal funding and financing directly. The funding programme should reward cities and metropolitan regions that can deliver results with greater funding, the letter added.
 
The alliance is also calling on funds to be targeted on urban areas to create multimodal solutions via grant programmes that reward congestion-reducing solutions.
 
Other members involved in the alliance include the Greater Washington Partnership, Massachusetts Competitive Partnership, Metro Atlanta Chamber, Silicon Valley Leadership Group and the Columbus Partnership.

 

Related Content

  • Infrastructure spending is an investment in economic recovery
    January 20, 2012
    Transportation funding is caught in the crossfire as the President calls for infrastructure investment and a reinvigorated Republican majority in the House pushes back on federal spending. Andrew Bardin Williams reports. Every few months some politician or pundit declares that the country is on the verge of making the most important political decision in a generation. The 2006 mid-term election; the 2008 Presidential election; the passing of the stimulus bill; healthcare reform; the mania surrounding Tea Pa
  • Full analysis: Massive US EV infrastructure plan
    February 21, 2023
    The White House has announced a huge financial boost, new standards, and major progress for a made-in-America national network of EV chargers to support the future of US EV charging
  • IBTTA calls on Congress to repeal regulation on tolling interstate highways
    May 24, 2017
    The White House has released President Trump’s fiscal year 2018 budget, including a US$200 billion investment in infrastructure projects over the next 10 years with a focus on leveraging the power of public private partnerships. The International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA) has responded, saying the government should repeal the burden of regulation and give states maximum flexibility to use financing tools to meet their local needs. 35 states and territories throughout the country have u
  • ATA coalition asks congress to reject devolution of highway program
    March 18, 2015
    In a letter to Congress, the American Trucking Association (ATA) and a coalition of 37 other organisations has warned about the dangers of devolving the federal highway program and urged passage of a robust, long-term highway bill that secures the federal role in transportation. In the letter, ATA and its allies told Congress they strongly oppose devolution proposals such as the Transportation Empowerment Act (TEA), previously introduced and considered in the 113th Congress. They say TEA is an ill-conceive