Skip to main content

EU regions urge adequate funding for sustainable transport

The European Committee of the Regions (CoR) is concerned by the lack of investment by the EU in the transport sector. According to regions and cities, very little progress has been made also in integrating the European transport market in the last four years. These concerns were debated by CoR members at the 16 April plenary session, which saw the adoption of the opinion on the implementation of the 2011 European Commission White Paper on Transport, aiming to create a single European transport area. The
April 21, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
The European Committee of the Regions (CoR) is concerned by the lack of investment by the EU in the transport sector. According to regions and cities, very little progress has been made also in integrating the European transport market in the last four years. These concerns were debated by CoR members at the 16 April plenary session, which saw the adoption of the opinion on the implementation of the 2011 1690 European Commission White Paper on Transport, aiming to create a single European transport area.

The CoR shares the objectives of the Commission to transform the European transport system by promoting independence from oil and creating multimodal mobility. Nonetheless, it raised concern that the Juncker plan will siphon off US$2.9 billion "when the budget is already too small to build the trans-European transport network". The CoR Regions regrets the EU's "clearly inadequate investment" in a sustainable transport system and emphasises that transport is a key part of the EU's economy and that it must continue to be a major European policy.  

Furthermore, the opinion points out the need to make the European transport sector more competitive. To this end, it calls for promoting and ensuring free movements of goods and products within the EU internal market. However, the CoR stresses that, even though this is especially important in the road transport sector, no relevant initiatives to deepen the internal market have been undertaken so far.

In addition, the regions pointed out that very little progress has been made in the field of pan-European information on multimodal transport and ticketing services. Also, they raised concern on the fact that currently most Member States still do not have a national system bringing together all predefined transport timetables in operation. Having this could make the use of public transport much more appealing to travellers, they assured.

With regard to rail and road transport, EU regions called for a stronger modal shift from road to trail as well as for promoting interoperability between rail systems. However, they asked that equal attention is given to urban public transport, since it can have the" strongest immediate impact" on environment and on life quality of citizens, especially in the most densely populated regions of the EU.

The need to reduce traffic in big airports was also stressed, especially because this would help reduce air pollution. To do so, EU regions and cities recommended connecting international air transport hubs to global TEN-T networks, as well as creating transport chains for passengers and freight. This would make it possible to reduce saturation of the airports and improve the energy performance of this type of transport, according to the regions and cities.
UTC

Related Content

  • October 26, 2016
    Develop transport infrastructure in Central and Eastern Europe, say MEPs
    Maximising the use of EU funding is needed to reduce disparities in infrastructure development between Central and Eastern Europe and the rest of the EU, MEPs say in a resolution voted in the European Parliament on Tuesday. The focus should be on completing the TEN-T corridors, bridging missing links, removing bottlenecks and improve connections between different modes of transport. So far most of the transport infrastructure projects planned to be financed by European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFS
  • January 30, 2012
    Cross border enforcement a logical step
    The logic supporting a cross-border enforcement Directive for the European Union (EU) is both detailed and compelling. The White Paper on European transport policy published in 2001 included the ambitious objective of reducing by 50 per cent by 2010 the number of people killed on the roads of the EU. But since 2005 the reduction in the number of road deaths has been slowing down: overall, the period from 2001 until 2009 saw the number of fatalities decrease by 36 per cent. According to Community indicators,
  • February 1, 2012
    Include ITS in policy decisions from the start, not as an afterthought
    DG TREN's Fotis Karamitsos, on why the European Commission's new ITS Action Plan is looking to the past for future direction. The European Commission's (EC's) new Action Plan for the Deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in Europe, which was announced as 2008 drew to a close, intends that transport and travel become 'cleaner; more efficient, including energy efficient; and safer and more secure'. At first sight, that wording might be interpreted as marking a significant policy shift within Europe, wit
  • August 21, 2017
    Cost benefit goes under the microscope
    Conventional cost benefit analysis (CBA) of plans for urban smart mobility initiatives needs serious rethinking, according to a recently-completed European study. The three-year Evidence Project (the Project) emerged in response to concerns about the availability and quality of documented research – including CBA – required to prove that investment in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) can be economically beneficial. Covering 22 sectors ranging from electric vehicles to shared spaces, the Project clai