Skip to main content

Dutch C-ITS project publishes results

Researchers have published the results of a three year project on developing and testing Cooperative ITS (C-ITS) on a 17 km stretch of the A58 motorway between Eindhoven and Tilburg in the Netherlands in a live traffic situation. From early 2014 to late 2016, eleven consortia, representing 27 market partners and academic institutions, worked in collaboration with the Dutch authorities on the Shockwave Traffic Jams A58 project, with the objective of accelerating the introduction of cooperative systems in
April 13, 2017 Read time: 2 mins
Researchers have published the results of a three year project on developing and testing Cooperative ITS (C-ITS) on a 17 km stretch of the A58 motorway between Eindhoven and Tilburg in the Netherlands in a live traffic situation.

From early 2014 to late 2016, eleven consortia, representing 27 market partners and academic institutions, worked in collaboration with the Dutch authorities on the Shockwave Traffic Jams A58 project, with the objective of accelerating the introduction of cooperative systems in the Netherlands. The means for achieving this was the development of a shockwave traffic jam service: an in-car service that, after up-scaling, would prevent or reduce shockwave traffic jams.

Shockwave Traffic Jams A58 was concluded in late 2016. According to the participants, the tests have demonstrated that the system as delivered works and that the shockwave traffic jam service does offer the potential of reducing shockwave traffic jams.

Also relevant is the fact that the system can be scaled up, continued and transferred and has also proven to be ‘privacy-proof’. This is due to its smart architecture, which means the Shockwave Traffic Jams A58 system ended up being not a bespoke system that can only prove its worth on the A58, but an open and generic system that can be easily expanded both geographically for use in other regions and functionally, making it suitable for other applications.

However, this does not mean that cooperative technology will be available throughout the Netherlands as early as tomorrow. Development will continue in, for example, the public-private Talking Traffic Partnership, in order to strengthen the ties between roadside and vehicles.

Related Content

  • A fresh approach to electronic fee collection
    July 16, 2012
    The Utah Transit Authority (UTA) is pioneering fresh approaches to Electronic Fee Collection (EFC) deployment in the US. Its new system, operational since January 2009 on all buses and commuter trains, is the country's first full-network rollout of transit e-ticketing technology built on an open-payment network, according to the organisation's Technology Programme Development Manager Craig Roberts.
  • Ertico partners in step for Europe-wide cooperative traffic systems
    December 5, 2012
    According to Ertico, the future of traffic management on urban and inter-urban networks will rely on direct communication and interaction between vehicles and the infrastructure, using new technologies called cooperative intelligent transport systems (C-ITS) that support real-time exchange of traffic data. This cooperation can enable a wide range of applications such as vehicle-sourced data collection, green light and speed advice, automated hazard detection, selective vehicle priority, dynamic city logisti
  • Carbon finance delivers critical support to mass transit schemes
    February 2, 2012
    David Crawford investigates carbon finance in transport. World Bank carbon finance grants are delivering critical support to major mass transit deployments in emerging and developing economies. Only recently operative in the transport sector, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM, see panel) is designed to generate additional income streams and improve internal rates of return on projects funded from public- and private-sector sources.
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t