Disability Rights California sues San Diego over dockless scooters

While the clutter from mis-used dockless scooter schemes is frustrating for many, it is physically unsafe for some, according to a legal action in the US. Disability Rights California slams an ‘unregulated onslaught’ in its class action lawsuit against the City of San Diego and three dockless scooter firms: Lime, Bird and Razor. “This action challenges the failure of the City of San Diego and private companies to maintain the accessibility of the city’s public sidewalks, kerb ramps, crosswalks and transit
January 30, 2019 Read time: 2 mins

While the clutter from mis-used dockless scooter schemes is frustrating for many, it is physically unsafe for some, according to a legal action in the US.

Disability Rights California slams an ‘unregulated onslaught’ in its class action lawsuit against the City of San Diego and three dockless scooter firms: Lime, Bird and Razor.

“This action challenges the failure of the City of San Diego and private companies to maintain the accessibility of the city’s public sidewalks, kerb ramps, crosswalks and transit stops for people with disabilities, in the face of an onslaught of unregulated dockless scooters,” the complaint says.

“Private scooter companies have been allowed to appropriate the public commons for their own profit, regardless of the impact on the city’s residents. Persons with mobility impairments, including people who use wheelchairs or walkers, and people with significant visual impairments are thereby being denied their right to travel freely and safely on our public walkways.”

As well as blocking rights of way on pavements, abandoned scooters are potential trip hazards.

The lawsuit adds: “Dockless scooter riders often ride the scooters on the sidewalk, turning the sidewalk into a vehicle highway rather than a space for safe pedestrian access and use.”

The action says the city and the companies are not complying with the 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act: “People with disabilities who wish to travel in the city using the city’s walkways are being forced to either put their physical safety at risk or just stay home. This is not a choice that they should have to make.”

Last September, city authorities said that the scooter providers had “agreed to implement a number of changes and improvements aimed at increasing public awareness and increasing public safety”.

Urban Traffic Control

Related Content

  • The downside of driverless vehicles
    October 27, 2016
    Driverless cars will have a detrimental effect on congestion and security while the road safety benefits can be achieved sooner and cheaper using ADAS, argues Colin Sowman. Many Governments are consulting about the introduction of driverless vehicles and even running trials. As 70% or 80% of crashes are caused by human error, the promise of a crash-free future of driverless, self-driving or autonomous vehicles (call them what you will) is alluring, as are the claims of reduced congestion and lower emissions
    Read More
  • Most pedestrian detection systems ‘hit pedestrians at 30mph’
    October 14, 2019
    In-car automatic emergency braking systems with pedestrian detection mostly fail to avoid hitting pedestrians - and are “completely ineffective at night”, according to new research. In shocking findings, the American Automobile Association (AAA) revealed that most systems hit a simulated pedestrian target at 30mph. A collision also occurred 89% of the time when a vehicle operating at 20mph encountered a child darting between two cars. In tests, all vehicles collided with an adult pedestrian immediately fo
    Read More
  • Annika Lundkvist of Pedestrianspace.org: "How are you moving today?"
    March 8, 2024
    It’s easy to say that people should embrace active travel – but it’s often not as simple as that. Advocates must beware of a disconnect with people’s lives and options on the ground, says Annika Lundkvist
    Read More
  • ECJ rules German ‘user pays’ toll is ‘unlawful’
    June 20, 2019
    The legal framework for what the German authorities call an ‘infrastructure use charge’ has been in place since 2015, and requires passenger vehicles using the country’s highways to pay a vignette of no more than €130 per year. The legal sticking point is that, while owners of vehicles registered in Germany qualify for relief from motor vehicle tax “to an amount that is at least equivalent to the amount of the charge that they will have had to pay”, foreign drivers do not enjoy such a concession. In
    Read More

Highlighted Content