Skip to main content

Disability Rights California sues San Diego over dockless scooters

While the clutter from mis-used dockless scooter schemes is frustrating for many, it is physically unsafe for some, according to a legal action in the US. Disability Rights California slams an ‘unregulated onslaught’ in its class action lawsuit against the City of San Diego and three dockless scooter firms: Lime, Bird and Razor. “This action challenges the failure of the City of San Diego and private companies to maintain the accessibility of the city’s public sidewalks, kerb ramps, crosswalks and transit
January 30, 2019 Read time: 2 mins

While the clutter from mis-used dockless scooter schemes is frustrating for many, it is physically unsafe for some, according to a legal action in the US.

Disability Rights California slams an ‘unregulated onslaught’ in its class action lawsuit against the City of San Diego and three dockless scooter firms: Lime, Bird and Razor.

“This action challenges the failure of the City of San Diego and private companies to maintain the accessibility of the city’s public sidewalks, kerb ramps, crosswalks and transit stops for people with disabilities, in the face of an onslaught of unregulated dockless scooters,” the complaint says.

“Private scooter companies have been allowed to appropriate the public commons for their own profit, regardless of the impact on the city’s residents. Persons with mobility impairments, including people who use wheelchairs or walkers, and people with significant visual impairments are thereby being denied their right to travel freely and safely on our public walkways.”

As well as blocking rights of way on pavements, abandoned scooters are potential trip hazards.

The lawsuit adds: “Dockless scooter riders often ride the scooters on the sidewalk, turning the sidewalk into a vehicle highway rather than a space for safe pedestrian access and use.”

The action says the city and the companies are not complying with the 1990 Americans With Disabilities Act: “People with disabilities who wish to travel in the city using the city’s walkways are being forced to either put their physical safety at risk or just stay home. This is not a choice that they should have to make.”

Last September, city authorities said that the scooter providers had “agreed to implement a number of changes and improvements aimed at increasing public awareness and increasing public safety”.

Related Content

  • Optimus to launch AV services in New York and California
    March 29, 2019
    Optimus Ride is to launch autonomous vehicle (AV) mobility services for residents and workers in Brooklyn, New York and Paradise Valley Estates in Fairfield, California. The company says it will deploy the AVs (or ‘self-driving vehicles’, as it calls them) at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, a 300-acre modern industrial park, before June. The service will run on private roads, providing a loop shuttle service to connect NYC Ferry passengers to Flushing Avenue, outside the yard’s perimeter. David Ehrenberg, presid
  • Transit in a time of protest
    July 13, 2020
    Street demonstrations at times create tricky balancing acts for public transportation providers - and the recent Black Lives Matter protests have also put a spotlight on the deeper problem of ‘infrastructural racism’…
  • Helsinki research project identifies micromobility confusion
    December 28, 2023
    Voi used Drover AI's PathPilot application to warn e-scooter users of off-road riding
  • Debating road user charging systems
    January 26, 2012
    Are pre-launch trials of charging systems the way to improve public acceptance? Or is the real key a more robust political attitude? Here, leading system suppliers discuss the issue. The use of distance-based Road User Charging (RUC) is now well established, at least for heavy goods vehicles on strategic roads. However demand management for all vehicles, whether a distance-based charge or some form of cordon scheme, has yet to make significant progress. This is in spite of the logic and equity of RUC being