Skip to main content

Cyclists are ‘not hooligans’: study

The perception of cyclists as ‘hooligans’ who ignore the rules of the road is a false one, according to a new study. "From our observations, we are unable to see any such anarchy among cyclists in traffic," says Sonja Forward, researcher at the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI). As vulnerable road users (VRUs), cyclists’ behaviour in traffic is particularly important for their safety. VTI examined traffic on two bridges - Danvikstull and Liljeholmen – in Stockholm and concluded
April 23, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

The perception of cyclists as ‘hooligans’ who ignore the rules of the road is a false one, according to a new study.

"From our observations, we are unable to see any such anarchy among cyclists in traffic," says Sonja Forward, researcher at the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (5230 VTI).

As vulnerable road users (VRUs), cyclists’ behaviour in traffic is particularly important for their safety. VTI examined traffic on two bridges - Danvikstull and Liljeholmen – in Stockholm and concluded that “people who complain that it is common for cyclists to bike however they want without due care and attention to others, are wrong”.

"There are, of course, those who are not considerate, but they are the exception rather than the rule,” adds Forward.

In its study, VTI found that:

  • Both cyclists and pedestrians are good at keeping to their own surfaces
  • Conflicts between cyclists are more common than bust-ups between cyclists and pedestrians
  • Cyclist/pedestrian problems occurred most often when pedestrians walked on the cycle lane - it was not as common for cyclists to stray onto the walkway
  • Motorists not giving way at junctions was the cause of the most serious arguments

“We saw cyclists who had the right of way when crossing and motorists who failed to give way,” Forward continues. “We also saw drivers who were considerate and acted as they should, but then other drivers behind beeped their horns.”

VTI recommends that, in places with a large number of cyclists, they should be separated from pedestrians. The organisation also wants the width of cycle lanes increased and for overtaking lanes to be introduced on uphill sections. Traffic signals should also be adapted for cyclists, in the same way they are currently adapted for motorists, VTI concludes.

Related Content

  • Speed limits: is 20 really plenty?
    June 16, 2020
    Speed kills – which means cutting speed should cut collisions. But is it that simple?
  • C-ITS in the EU: ‘It has got a little tribal recently’
    April 16, 2019
    As the C-ITS Delegated Act begins its journey through the European policy maze, Adam Hill looks at who is expecting what from this proposed framework for connected vehicles – and why some people are insisting that the lawmakers are already getting things wrong
  • Changing driving conditions need ongoing driver training
    January 23, 2012
    Trevor Ellis, chairman of the ITS UK Enforcement Interest Group, considers the role of ongoing driver training in increasing compliance. It is over 30 years since I passed my driving test. The world was quite a different place then, in that there were only half the vehicles there are now on the UK's roads, mobile phones did not really exist and (in the UK at least) the vast majority of us drove cars which by today's standards exhibited dreadful dynamic stability and were woefully underpowered.
  • BlackBerry’s Jeff Davis: ‘Hands off 5.9GHz!’
    September 25, 2019
    As a US Marine, BlackBerry’s Jeff Davis saw the world’s trouble spots. But much of his attention is now focused on what he sees as the ITS sector’s biggest issue: cybersecurity. Adam Hill finds out more Oh, I often feel I’m the dumbest guy in the room,” laughs Jeff Davis, senior director, connected transportation, at BlackBerry. It’s hard to credit this. Davis has a range of experience that sets him apart from most people in the ITS sector. He was in the US Marine Corps, with seven tours of duty, inclu