Skip to main content

Cyclists are ‘not hooligans’: study

The perception of cyclists as ‘hooligans’ who ignore the rules of the road is a false one, according to a new study. "From our observations, we are unable to see any such anarchy among cyclists in traffic," says Sonja Forward, researcher at the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI). As vulnerable road users (VRUs), cyclists’ behaviour in traffic is particularly important for their safety. VTI examined traffic on two bridges - Danvikstull and Liljeholmen – in Stockholm and concluded
April 23, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

The perception of cyclists as ‘hooligans’ who ignore the rules of the road is a false one, according to a new study.

"From our observations, we are unable to see any such anarchy among cyclists in traffic," says Sonja Forward, researcher at the Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (5230 VTI).

As vulnerable road users (VRUs), cyclists’ behaviour in traffic is particularly important for their safety. VTI examined traffic on two bridges - Danvikstull and Liljeholmen – in Stockholm and concluded that “people who complain that it is common for cyclists to bike however they want without due care and attention to others, are wrong”.

"There are, of course, those who are not considerate, but they are the exception rather than the rule,” adds Forward.

In its study, VTI found that:

  • Both cyclists and pedestrians are good at keeping to their own surfaces
  • Conflicts between cyclists are more common than bust-ups between cyclists and pedestrians
  • Cyclist/pedestrian problems occurred most often when pedestrians walked on the cycle lane - it was not as common for cyclists to stray onto the walkway
  • Motorists not giving way at junctions was the cause of the most serious arguments

“We saw cyclists who had the right of way when crossing and motorists who failed to give way,” Forward continues. “We also saw drivers who were considerate and acted as they should, but then other drivers behind beeped their horns.”

VTI recommends that, in places with a large number of cyclists, they should be separated from pedestrians. The organisation also wants the width of cycle lanes increased and for overtaking lanes to be introduced on uphill sections. Traffic signals should also be adapted for cyclists, in the same way they are currently adapted for motorists, VTI concludes.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Governments must develop regulations to ensure AV safety, experts warn
    January 9, 2019
    Governments are “lagging behind” in developing regulations to ensure the safety of autonomous vehicles (AVs). This was among the main messages from a key session at this week’s Consumer Electronics Event 2019 event in Las Vegas, US. Speaking during ‘Mobility and Connectivity Perspectives from the C-suite’, Joe Vitale, global automotive leader at Deloitte, said the company’s yearly consumer study has shown that more people feel getting into an AV is unsafe, which is in part due to the deaths caused b
  • Auckland reduces airport journey times
    April 16, 2018
    Getting from the centre of Auckland to the city’s airport used to be fraught with unwanted stress for passengers – but a new system combining radar, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi is smoothing things over. Andrew Stone investigates. Struggling to cope with steady growth in passenger numbers and the costly traffic congestion which that can entail, New Zealand’s Auckland International Airport has deployed an innovative system that is smoothing traffic and passenger flows. The same system is also offering new, data-led
  • CV app boosts school zone safety, says study
    October 28, 2021
    Drivers operated in Stealth/Off, Audio On and Audio/Visual On conditions 
  • Growth of legislation in favour of US enforcement market
    February 1, 2012
    The automated road safety enforcement industry in the United States had a very robust 2010. The industry continued to grow to the point that providers now have nearly 5,000 cameras deployed in 25 of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, with more than 650 communities utilising such life-saving technology. Intersection safety cameras are the most common application but more communities are also implementing road safety camera programmes to deter excessive speeding. Deploying cameras to protect children