Skip to main content

Covid-19: ‘Probably the largest street planning experiment, ever’

A ‘precipitous’ drop in urban road traffic caused by Covid-19 has brought some benefits in terms of cleaner air and empty streets – but is in most ways a negative phenomenon.
By Adam Hill April 9, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
A 'precipitous' drop in city traffic might usually be good news (© Marie Lemerle | Dreamstime.com)

That is one of the main messages from Philippe Crist, advisor on innovation and foresight for the International Transport Forum at the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Speaking on the Populus webinar Street Planning During Uncertain Times: How cities are making bold decisions to prioritise cyclists and pedestrians, he said: “I think what we're witnessing from our apartments, from our houses, from those places where you are sheltering, is probably the largest street planning experiment, ever. But one thing that is going to be hard for many of us is that some of these lessons we can never use.”

Crist insisted that people in the mobility industry must choose their words carefully when describing “what we're witnessing in our cities and how we move forward with that”.

He showed an image of a deserted Arc de Triomphe in Paris to highlight how Covid-19 has resulted in far less traffic, quieter streets and lower pollution. “All these in normal times are really good things, and yet they're happening because of something really, really bad,” he added.

The changes have been caused by a virus which has already cost tens of thousands of lives and threatens to severely disrupt the world’s economy.

“Going forward, those people who have worked in the past to try to bring about some of these things - clear skies, quiet cities, safe cities, streets that respond to people's needs - will have to be very careful not to talk about this period, this exceptional street planning experiment, in nostalgic or even positive terms.”

“Most people will see this as a very bad time, and the connotation will not be positive, it'll be quite negative. And that's just something to keep in mind.”

The mobility industry should be looking at ways of making the ‘new normal’ better when cities ‘reboot’ after prolonged lockdowns, such as improving system resilience and providing more urban space for active mobility such as walking and cycling. 

But Crist said planners will have to take into account what he termed ‘Co-voidance behaviour’, where people may be wary of shared and public transport. 

They should also be prepared for people to want things to return to the way they were before the pandemic, he said – especially when it comes to ramping up economic activity. 

“I think there will be a real push for the ‘old’ normal.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Cohda: using different CV technologies would be ‘missed opportunity’
    May 26, 2020
    C-V2X versus DSRC is an issue that regulators - not the market - should decide
  • Ex-Conduent CEO: ‘I am not a career transportation person’
    June 11, 2019
    Just prior to resigning as Conduent Transportation CEO, Mick Slattery talked to Adam Hill about the importance of digital and how tech can transform ITS. "I am not a career public sector person,” declares Mick Slattery, chief executive officer of Conduent Transportation, at the beginning of his interview with ITS International. “I am not a career transportation person. I am new to this industry, effective August last year. At my core I’ve spent my career creating and launching new opportunities for clie
  • Outlook good for transportation technology funding
    January 25, 2012
    Chris Cheever and Chris Thomas of Fontinalis Partners discuss the funding outlook for the ITS industry – where the money’s going to come from, and what needs to happen to facilitate change
  • ITS benefits escape public
    June 8, 2015
    John Kendall considers the public’s awareness of the benefits of ITS. While the results of developing ITS technology may be clear to readers of ITS International, there is far less evidence that drivers have any appreciation of what the technology is doing for them. So how aware are drivers of the developments that are designed to make their journeys less congested and safer?