Skip to main content

British drivers face ban on hands-free mobiles

UK drivers could be banned from using phones in hands-free mode, following a suggestion from MPs. The House of Commons Transport Select Committee has said that current UK law creates the “misleading impression” that the use of hands-free phones is a safe driving practice. However, there is increasing evidence to show that hands-free usage “creates the same risks of collision as using a hand-held device,” say the law-makers. In its latest report, Road Safety: driving while using a mobile phone, the
August 14, 2019 Read time: 3 mins

UK drivers could be banned from using phones in hands-free mode, following a suggestion from MPs.

The House of Commons Transport Select Committee has said that current UK law creates the “misleading impression” that the use of hands-free phones is a safe driving practice.

However, there is increasing evidence to show that hands-free usage “creates the same risks of collision as using a hand-held device,” say the law-makers.

In its latest %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external report false https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmtrans/2329/2329.pdf false false%>, Road Safety: driving while using a mobile phone, the committee says there were 773 causalities (including 43 deaths and 135 serious injuries in 2017) resulting from collisions where a driver using a mobile phone was a contributing factor.

The committee is now calling on the UK government to explore options for extending the ban on driving while using a hand-held mobile phone to include hands-free devices. It wants that the government publish a public consultation on the proposal by the end of 2019.

The report recommends that the government considers whether penalties for driving while using a mobile phone should be increased to “better reflect” the risks created by offenders.

Since March 2017, UK drivers caught using a hand-held mobile phone have faced incurring 6 penalty points on their licence and a £200 fine.

Additionally, the committee is urging the government to work with the police and crime commissioners to explore options for improving enforcement while also looking at opportunities to make greater use of technology.

Chair of the committee, Lilian Greenwood MP, says: “Despite the real risk of catastrophic consequences for themselves, their passengers and other road users, far too many drivers continue to break the law by using hand-held mobile phones.

“If mobile phone use while driving is to become as socially unacceptable as drink driving much more effort needs to go into educating drivers about the risks and consequences of using a phone behind the wheel. Offenders also need to know there is a credible risk of being caught, and that there are serious consequences for being caught.”

She insists that any use of a phone distracts a driver’s ability to pay full attention and the government should “consider extending the ban to reflect this”.

“Each death and serious injury which results from a driver using a mobile phone is a tragedy that is entirely avoidable,” Greenwood continues. “We need tougher restrictions, better enforcement and more education to make our roads safer for all.

UTC

Related Content

  • April 24, 2013
    ITS America appoints new technical editor
    ITS America has chosen Dr John Miles as technical editor for a new web-based resource on ITS. With funding from the US Department of Transportation (USDOT), the society plans to publish in mid-2014 in partnership with the World Road Association (PIARC) on the latter’s website.
  • May 23, 2019
    Qualcomm violated antitrust laws, says US district judge
    Qualcomm has been accused of supressing competition from smartphone chip rivals by threatening to cut off supplies and extract licensing fees. US District Judge Lucy Koh has ordered the company to renegotiate licensing agreements at reasonable prices. Qualcomm, a key player in the ITS industry - particularly in the nascent area of 5G technology - refutes the ruling. “We strongly disagree with the judge’s conclusions, her interpretation of the facts and her application of the law,” said Don Rosenberg
  • October 8, 2019
    LAX bans ride-hailing pick-ups at terminals
    Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) is to ban ride-hailing companies such as Uber and Lyft from picking up passengers outside its terminals. The draconian move, which is planned to come into force later this month, is in a bid to reduce congestion at the airport - although the Los Angeles Times reports that passengers will still be able to book rides home from a parking lot near Terminal 1, which can be reached by airport shuttle. Questions over ride-hailing’s contribution to gridlock continue to
  • October 23, 2018
    Addison Lee and Oxbotica to implement AV services in London by 2021
    Addison Lee has partnered with self-driving vehicle software company Oxbotica in a bid to bring autonomous ride-sharing services to London by 2021. Addison Lee, a UK private taxi hire firm, says it will also explore opportunities to provide corporate shuttles, airport and campus-based services. Andy Boland, CEO of Addison Lee, says: “By providing ride-sharing services, we can help address congestion, free space used for parking and improve urban air quality through zero-emission vehicles.” The partners