Skip to main content

PennDOT 511 traveller information system to be privatised

The Pennsylvania Department of Transport (PennDOT) 511 system, 511PA, and the Pennsylvania Turnpike’s Roadway Information Program (TRIP), are to be privatised, following approval by the Pennsylvania Public Private Transportation Partnership (P3) Board of a project soliciting private sector proposals to manage and operate the systems. In operation since 2009, 511PA provides traffic-delay warnings, weather forecasts, average traffic speeds on urban interstates and access to more than 670 traffic cameras. The
January 11, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
The 6111 Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (PennDOT) 511 system, 511PA, and the 774 Pennsylvania Turnpike’s Roadway Information Program (TRIP), are to be privatised, following approval by the Pennsylvania Public Private Transportation Partnership (P3) Board of a project soliciting private sector proposals to manage and operate the systems.

In operation since 2009, 511PA provides traffic-delay warnings, weather forecasts, average traffic speeds on urban interstates and access to more than 670 traffic cameras. The 511 site also provides easy-to-use, colour-coded winter road conditions for all interstates and other routes covered in the 511 reporting network. Regional Twitter alerts are also available on the 511PA website. The Pennsylvania Turnpike also deploys its own traveller information system, TRIP, which provides traffic and weather information.

“I feel strongly that having traveller information available in a variety of ways, and utilising the latest technologies, is a crucial service travellers have come to expect and deserve,” PennDOT Secretary and P3 board chairman Barry J. Schoch said. “With innovation in the marketplace happening at a lightning pace, a public-sector entity such as PennDOT cannot take full advantage of the latest advancements, so we will challenge the private sector to provide us with a solution that allows us to do just that.”

Proposals will be reviewed by a team of staff from PennDOT and the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission to determine if customer service is maintained or can be enhanced, and if the proposal offers the opportunity to offset costs through sponsorships of the program. If the proposal is determined to be sound, PennDOT will begin negotiations and execute a contract for a private entity to provide these services for a defined period of time with various performance requirements.

The P3 Board also approved soliciting proposals on: traffic-flow data; video sharing; staffing and managing a statewide traffic management center and regional traffic management center near Clearfield; enhancing and managing PennDOT’s road weather information systems; administering the outdoor advertising program; sponsorship opportunities at Pennsylvania welcome centres and rest areas; sponsorship of PennDOT’s freeway service patrols; managing PennDOT’s sponsor-a-highway Program; and sponsoring PennDOT’s yellow dot program. PennDOT will explore possible public private partnership opportunities in all of these programs but a decision on whether to enter into any contractual agreement on any or all will only be determined after a review of proposals submitted through a competitive procurement process.

Last September, Governor Tom Corbett signed into law the Public and Private Partnerships for Transportation Act, which authorised P3 projects in Pennsylvania. This law allows PennDOT and other transportation authorities and commissions to partner with private companies to participate in delivering, maintaining and financing transportation-related projects.

As part of the P3 law, the seven-member Public Private Transportation Partnership
Board was appointed to examine and approve potential public private transportation projects. If the board determines a state operation would be more cost-effectively administered by a private company, the company will be authorised to submit a proposal and enter into a contract to either completely or partially take over that operation for a defined period of time.

Related Content

  • May 29, 2013
    ITS advancement lays beyond benefit-cost analysis
    Shelley Row, former Director of the US Department of Transportation’s ITS Joint Program Office, gives her views on the way forward for the industry. We, as intelligent transportation system (ITS) proponents and engineers, tend to be overly fixated on benefit-cost data. We want decisions to be made on logical grounds for which benefit-cost calculations are optimal. While benefit-cost data is necessary, it is not always sufficient. We can learn from our history where we see three broad groups of ITS deploymen
  • April 10, 2012
    Why integrated traffic management needs a cohesive approach
    Traffic control is increasingly being viewed as one essential element of a wider ‘system of systems’ – the smart city. Jason Barnes, Jon Masters and David Crawford report on latest ideas and efforts for making cities ‘smarter’ Virtually every element of the fabric and utilitarian operations that make urban areas tick can now be found somewhere in the mix that is the ‘smart city’ agenda. Ideas have expanded and projects pursued in different directions as the rhetoric on making cities ‘smarter’ has grown. App
  • May 26, 2021
    Pennsylvania Turnpike installs Bosch cameras 
    Autodome IP starlight 7000i models will help to quickly identify roadway incidents
  • February 1, 2012
    Will standardisation increase ITS interoperability?
    Theoretical balance Kallistratos Dionelis, secretary general of ASECAP, comments on the European Commission's new ICT Standardisation Work Programme. I've just read a proposal from the European Commission on the 2010-2013 ICT Standardisation Work Programme. As ASECAP Secretary General this is one of my responsibilities. I work to receive information, to disseminate information and to build bridges and mutual understanding between policy-makers and the industrial world, between ASECAP and others.