Skip to main content

European Commissioner blasts auto industry on defeat device scandal

Speaking at the FIA summer cocktail party, European Commissioner Elżbieta Bieńkowska compared the emissions defeat device scandal to the banking crisis and proposed a three step programme to ensure that market confidence is restored. She insisted on the need for the auto industry to show all their cards so that constructive progress could be made. Her plans include the need to reform the EU's type-approval and market surveillance system. She also endorsed long-term investment in a low-carbon transport syst
July 12, 2016 Read time: 2 mins

Speaking at the FIA summer cocktail party, European Commissioner Elżbieta Bieńkowska compared the emissions defeat device scandal to the banking crisis and proposed a three step programme to ensure that market confidence is restored. She insisted on the need for the auto industry to show all their cards so that constructive progress could be made. Her plans include the need to reform the EU's type-approval and market surveillance system.

She also endorsed long-term investment in a low-carbon transport system and a clear policy target for zero emission vehicles. Her final step was to make the vehicle testing regime fit for the future, through the real-driving emissions packages and the newly approved test cycle for CO2.

In his speech Günther Oettinger, Commissioner for the Digital Economy and Society, made a firm commitment to include consumer voices in the development of the connected car market, saying that it is the 350 million drivers in Europe that are the investors in the automotive market and the industry has a responsibility to create vehicles that respond to consumer needs. He voiced his support for data protection with connected cars and European digital civil rights. He concluded with the need to define who owns the data that connected cars generate, be it the driver, the auto manufacturer, or the telecoms provider.

Also at the event, racing driver Tom Kristensen highlighted the need for constant training and updating of road safety knowledge to keep road users aware of changing rules, new technologies and new requirements on drivers. He emphasised that traffic education and driver training is a lifelong endeavour, saying that new technologies are increasingly becoming the norm and drivers need additional information on how these technologies affect the rules of the road.

Related Content

  • A carbon free and accident free Europe by 2015?
    February 2, 2012
    By 2050, the Europe Commission aims to make transport in Europe carbon- and accident-free. Between now and then, however, a significant technological development and deployment effort is needed. Here, Neelie Kroes, European Commission Vice-President for the Digital Agenda, talks about what's being done. In many respects, COOPERS, CVIS and SAFESPOT, set up by the European Commission (EC) to explore the potential of cooperative infrastructure systems, are already legacy projects. Between them, the three devel
  • Covid-19 cleared the air: ITS can keep it clean
    July 31, 2020
    Covid-19 has created cleaner air: ITS can help keep it that way – but it’s not going to be straightforward, as Graham Anderson discovers
  • Germany unveils plan to introduce car tolls
    August 11, 2014
    Germany's transportation minister, Alexander Dobrindt, has unveiled plans to introduce a toll on cars using the country's roads. However, it is not clear whether the proposal will meet with the approval of the EU. Germany has imposed a toll on trucks using its autobahns and other major thoroughfares since the start of 2005; the new toll would apply to all cars using all roads in Germany from the beginning of 2016 and could even extend to motorcycles. Dobrint said experts at the Transportation Ministry ha
  • Taking the long view of ITS
    March 24, 2015
    Caroline Visser believes the ITS industry must present a coherent case for consideration of the technology to become part of transport policy and planning. As ITS advisor and road finance director for the International Road Federation (IRF) in Geneva, Caroline Visser is well placed to evaluate quantifying the benefits of ITS implementation – a topic about which there is little agreement and even less consistency. She is pressing to get some consistency in the evaluation of ITS deployments through the use of