Skip to main content

Signal prioritisation as silver bullet

We can’t keep building roads to solve congestion. But help is available: transit signal prioritisation can easily reduce traffic and bring back riders to mass transit, says Bobby Lee of Lyt
By Bobby Lee January 13, 2023 Read time: 3 mins
Transit riders want three things: consistent travel times, frequent service and a reliable transit system © ITS International

There’s no doubt that we’re getting back in our cars. Post-Covid studies have shown that we fled from public transit to the safety of our private cars to avoid Covid transmission and haven’t returned. Our sudden reliance on private vehicles coincides with our insatiable appetite for building new roads or widening existing ones.

These two trends coinciding may not seem alarming at first, but many drivers may not be familiar with the effects of induced demand. If we build it, they will come - or, more lanes mean more traffic.

America’s largest 100 urban areas added 30,511 new lane-miles of roads between 1993 and 2017, according to a report by Transportation for America1, a 42% increase during that time, contrasted against a population growth of only 32%. In other words, we’re needlessly building more roads than necessary for our level of population growth.

And despite more roadways now created, traffic congestion (measured in hours per day) increased by 144% within that same period.  And let’s not even get started on the fact that each lane-mile of roadway cost between $4.2m and $15.4 million to build and an estimated $24,000 a year to maintain, with $500 billion spent to expand roads between 1993 and 2017.

It’s an untenable situation and we can’t keep building roads. Yet, we can’t seem to persuade drivers to get back onto public transit, which would represent an easy way to quickly reduce traffic congestion.

Is it possible there’s a better, smarter, and more cost-effective way to ultimately tame our nation’s traffic problems? The answer might be found in sophisticated, artificial intelligence-based technology that’s designed to be embedded in our current, everyday traffic infrastructure.

Three wishes for transit

Transit riders want three things: consistent travel times, frequent service, and a reliable transit system. Transit signal priority (TSP) is one of the easiest ways local transit agencies provide all the three wishes, but it requires a progressive view of how to better serve their ridership.

Local transit agencies which invest in transit signal priority help save riders time. But only if they use the right kind of priority solutions.

Legacy TSP systems haven’t evolved much from their introduction in the 1960s. Namely, being an expensive transmitter on buses that flash an infrared strobe light to receivers installed on traffic signal mast arms, much like a TV remote control. The cost to install this hardware on both signals and buses is quite high and requires regular maintenance and calibration to guarantee consistent operation. Not to mention the fact that it’s hard to tell if the system is actually working or audit its performance.

Next-gen TSP represents the silver bullet that transit agencies are looking for - predictive, ETA-based green lights provided well in advance of the bus’s arrival. These systems utilise the power of cloud-computing, AI and machine-learning technologies to better read movement, roadways, and ridership patterns.

Bobby LeeBy melding new technological advancements with proven strategies, transit agencies can reduce travel times by 20%, reduce fuel usage by 14%, and reduce bus emissions by 12%.

Communities which invest in next-gen solutions, like TSP, can benefit from having smarter infrastructure that adapts to real-time traffic conditions instead of being stuck with statically programmed infrastructure that quickly becomes ill-suited to the dynamic nature of traffic.

About the Author:
Bobby Lee is marketing director for Lyt, a provider of cloud-based smart traffic solutions


Reference
1: https://t4america.org/maps-tools/congestion-con/

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Connecticut Transit uses web feedback to improve user experience
    May 27, 2014
    Connecticut champions open government and open data to help fostertransparency, accountability and citizen engagement – and that includes transportation matters as Andrew Bardin Williams discovers. The last thing anyone wanted was to inconvenience or displace others - least of all people who lived and worked in the neighbourhood. Yet, workers in an office building in downtown New Haven, Conn., were tired of shuffling through hoards of people who kept sitting on the stoop to the building while waiting for th
  • Aimsun makes Paris match
    March 11, 2021
    How do digital twins allow city planners to test out new road layouts virtually?
  • Transition time for mobility in Hamburg
    June 11, 2025
    The City of Hamburg – host of the UITP Summit 2025 – has been working with PTV Group to make the most of technology to enhance urban mobility, and reach climate goals…
  • Why integrated traffic management needs a cohesive approach
    April 10, 2012
    Traffic control is increasingly being viewed as one essential element of a wider ‘system of systems’ – the smart city. Jason Barnes, Jon Masters and David Crawford report on latest ideas and efforts for making cities ‘smarter’ Virtually every element of the fabric and utilitarian operations that make urban areas tick can now be found somewhere in the mix that is the ‘smart city’ agenda. Ideas have expanded and projects pursued in different directions as the rhetoric on making cities ‘smarter’ has grown. App