Skip to main content

In-vehicle communication systems offer major safety benefits

Michael Schagrin and Raymond Resendes provide an update on the US Department of Transportation's vehicle-to-vehicle programme. The US Department of Transportation's (USDOT's) Vehicle-to- Vehicle (V2V) programme, which is concerned with wireless inter-vehicle communications for safety applications such as crash avoidance/mitigation, is a major safety component of the USDOT IntelliDrive cooperative infrastructure programme.
July 17, 2012 Read time: 4 mins

Michael Schagrin and Raymond Resendes provide an update on the US Department of Transportation's vehicle-to-vehicle programme.

The 324 US Department of Transportation's (USDOT's) Vehicle-to- Vehicle (V2V) programme, which is concerned with wireless inter-vehicle communications for safety applications such as crash avoidance/mitigation, is a major safety component of the USDOT IntelliDrive cooperative infrastructure programme.

IntelliDrive also sponsors research and other activities to support future connectivity among Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) and Vehicle-to-consumer Devices (V2D) to deliver safety and mobility benefits.

Research conducted by USDOT and the automotive industry has concluded that safety systems based on inter-vehicle communication offer the potential to significantly improve the effectiveness of crash avoidance and crash mitigation systems while lowering their cost.

USDOT recently developed a five-year research plan required to accelerate deployment of V2V-based safety systems. The plan was developed based on input from the automotive industry and other stakeholders, including 130 participants in a workshop held in Ypsilanti, Michigan in March 2009. The research plan identifies the interrelated research activities needed to resolve technical and policy issues. A similar effort is also underway to develop a five-year research plan for V2I safety systems, with an industry workshop being planned for later this summer.

The research plan is based on the following key assumptions: safety is the primary objective of the V2V capability, and V2V applications can address up to 95 per cent of crash scenarios; the need for infrastructure to support the security requirements for V2V Safety Applications is dependent on the deployment scenario, and requires further study; the system architecture for V2V will be compatible with the evolution in V2I technology and deployment, and this will allow for future upgrades that could provide additional safety benefits, and; at present, Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) remains the only available technology that meets the extremely low latency (fast transmission) and security requirements of active safety applications.

Since 2002, USDOT has been conducting research with automotive manufacturers (278 Ford, 948 General Motors, 1683 Honda, 1685 Mercedes-Benz and 1686 Toyota) to assess the feasibility of developing crash avoidance systems using V2V communications. Engineering prototypes have been developed and demonstrated with applications that address the most critical crash scenarios, which are: emergency brake light warning; forward collision warning; intersection movement assist; blind spot and lane change warning; 'do not pass' warning, and; control loss warning.

The development of these applications was critical to understanding the functional and performance requirements for the underlying technologies, such as positioning and communications. However, additional work needs to be done to address more complex crash scenarios for head-on collision avoidance, intersection collision avoidance, pedestrian crash warning, and extending the capabilities to prevent motorcycle crashes. These capabilities could be achieved by providing V2V communication capabilities to complement other vehicle-based safety technologies.

The V2V Safety Applications Research Plan defines six major activities, or tracks, which are required to accelerate deployment of V2V:

Track 1 - Crash scenario framework

Research objectives are to: further define the crash problem; establish requirements and specifications for priority crash avoidance applications; and select priority safety applications for prototype development.

Track 2 - Interoperability

In order to ensure that safety applications work in all equipped vehicles, common standards and protocols will be established for V2V systems. Specific objectives are: to develop communications standards and protocols; security protocols; positioning capabilities; messaging protocols; data rights; and privacy policies.

Track 3 - Benefits assessment

The key objective is to develop a methodology for estimating the safety benefits of V2V applications, including performance measures and objective test procedures. Applications that are found to have valid safety benefits will be considered for the consumer information programmes process.

Track 4 - Application development

Selected safety applications identified as the result of Track 1 activities will be developed into safety application prototypes.

Prototypes will be evaluated using the safety benefits assessment methods developed in Track 3.

Track 5 - Driver issues

Researchers will assess the effectiveness of driver interfaces, including: whether drivers understand the systems; if the systems lead to appropriate driver reactions; and if drivers accept the systems.

Track 6 - Policy

The policy-related issues that are critical to successful deployment, such as privacy and management of security certification, will be studied to ensure that the unique aspects of V2V are addressed within the global perspective of IntelliDrive.

The V2V for safety research plan is the first of several that USDOT is developing for IntelliDrive program components. Other roadmaps are addressing V2I for safety; V2I for mobility; and policy.

More information about the V2V programme and IntelliDrive is available at http://www.intellidrive.org

Michael Schagrin is Project Lead for the IntelliDrive programme in the ITSJoint Program Office of the 321 Research and Innovative Technology Administration, US Department of Transportation. Raymond Resendes is Chief of the Intelligent Technologies Research Division at the 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, US Department of Transportation.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Investment and innovation the future of ITS
    January 31, 2012
    Cisco's Paul Brubaker, former administrator of the US Department of Transportation's (USDOT's) Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA), takes a look at how the ITS sector is starting to attract the attention of major corporations and what this will mean for intelligent transportation in the coming years
  • Improving the positional accuracy of GNSS road user charging
    July 23, 2012
    The European GINA project is intended to address and overcome many of the institutional, technical and public acceptance hurdles currently faced by satellite-based road user charging schemes. Dave Tindall and Denis Naberezhnykh, TRL, and Laure Dezes, ERF, write. Pay-as-you-drive Road User Charging (RUC), whereby demand (or congestion) is managed by applying appropriate tariffs in order to encourage drivers to make their journeys at less busy times, on less congested routes or even on different modes, could
  • America fires V2V starting gun
    April 7, 2014
    Leo McCloskey, ITS America’s senior vice president for Technical Programs, talks to Jason Barnes about what the recent NHTSA ruling on light vehicle connectivity means for cooperative infrastructures in North America. In early February the US Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) announced it had decided to start taking steps to enable Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communication technology for light vehicles. In so doing, the many safety-related applicati
  • CRASH Predicts ‘unpredictable’ in traffic incidents
    November 11, 2015
    Road crashes are not as random as they may appear and analysing data can reveal patterns that can help various authorities target their resources more accurately. David Crawford reports. Figures from the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) show that in 2013 there were 32,719 people killed on American roads and 2.31 million injured. While these form part of an overall 25% drop over the decade from 2004, US Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx continues to stress that reaching the procl