Skip to main content

Europe agrees on polluter-pays principle for truck tolls

EU Member States will in future have the right to apply the polluter-pays principle when setting road tolls on trucks and lorries. They will be able to levy charges for external costs and vary tariffs in order to ease congestion during peak hours and to encourage fleet renewal. Earmarking of revenues for transport infrastructure was the key point of an informal deal reached on Monday evening between Parliament and Council representatives on the revised Eurovignette directive.
May 16, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
EU Member States will in future have the right to apply the polluter-pays principle when setting road tolls on trucks and lorries. They will be able to levy charges for external costs and vary tariffs in order to ease congestion during peak hours and to encourage fleet renewal. Earmarking of revenues for transport infrastructure was the key point of an informal deal reached on Monday evening between Parliament and Council representatives on the revised Eurovignette directive.

A compromise was hammered out on the contentious issue of earmarking toll revenues.  "We now have a strong commitment from the Member States to reinvest the money in sustainable transport and spend at least 15 per cent on TEN-T [Trans European Transport Network] projects", said Parliament's rapporteur Said El Khadraoui, reporting back to the Transport Committee on Tuesday.

In particular in mountain areas, where extra mark-ups may be added to infrastructure and external costs for older lorries with engines of Euro class 0, 1, 2 and 3 (starting in 2015), all revenue will have to be spent on financing TEN-T infrastructure projects situated on the same TEN corridor.

But the most important progress, according to Said El Khadraoui, has been made on the transparency of revenues and investment, based on the ETS (Emissions Trading Scheme) model. Member States will have to report back to the Commission on a regular basis on the various types of toll income, variations applied and how they have invested the money. This could prompt a fruitful public debate on transport infrastructure, financing and management at Member State level.

To allow better traffic management without generating extra revenues, toll variations will be allowed of up to 175 per cent in congested areas, with top tariffs collected during a maximum of five peak hours per day and lower tariffs applying the rest of the time. For the benefit of users, Parliament's negotiating team successfully pushed for a simple, clear and interoperable system and insisted that a User Guide be issued.

"This is not the end of the road", said El Khadraoui, "but it's an important step forward. I hope that Parliament can support the deal so that Member States can make the best use of the directive." Parliament's plenary vote is scheduled on 7 June.

Related Content

  • January 30, 2012
    Cross border enforcement a logical step
    The logic supporting a cross-border enforcement Directive for the European Union (EU) is both detailed and compelling. The White Paper on European transport policy published in 2001 included the ambitious objective of reducing by 50 per cent by 2010 the number of people killed on the roads of the EU. But since 2005 the reduction in the number of road deaths has been slowing down: overall, the period from 2001 until 2009 saw the number of fatalities decrease by 36 per cent. According to Community indicators,
  • January 25, 2012
    Effectively tackle vehicle pollution
    In 2008, Italy's first traffic charge named 'Ecopass' was launched in Milan in an attempt to reduce road congestion and pollution levels as well as to boost public transport through the re-investment of the pollution charge revenues.
  • February 2, 2012
    Is Europe's Galileo project value for money?
    Philippe Hamet discusses the progress of the European Union's Galileo Global Navigation Satellite System Project
  • January 16, 2012
    Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst