Skip to main content

Advanced controllers standing out in A crowd

TransCore has been helping New York City’s Department of Transportation (NYDOT) with its ITS efforts since the early 1980s, via various consultancy services contracts. The company is currently working for the city under an IDIQ (indefinite quantity) contract and a separate ITS maintenance contract. According to TransCore vice president Bob Rausch, who has witnessed much of New York’s ITS development, the three main ‘building blocks’ of the city’s ITS infrastructure have developed simultaneously over recent
February 28, 2013 Read time: 3 mins
Peek Traffic advanced solid state traffic controller: 10,000 have been procured so far and all 12,000 intersections will be  fitted out eventually

TransCore has been helping New York City’s Department of Transportation (NYDOT) with its ITS efforts since the early 1980s, via various consultancy services contracts. The company is currently working for the city under an IDIQ (indefinite quantity) contract and a separate ITS maintenance contract.

According to 139 Transcore vice president Bob Rausch, who has witnessed much of New York’s ITS development, the three main ‘building blocks’ of the city’s ITS infrastructure have developed simultaneously over recent years.

The city’s Traffic Management Centre in Queens is undoubtedly a key part of the operation. NYCDOT’s operations staff are based there, with the software systems for monitoring and managing the city’s streets; and sharing the facility with the New York City Joint Traffic Management Centre.

The NYCWiN wireless network is also a vital development of recent times. This has provided a massive uplift in connectivity and capability for the city. It has also allowed NYCDOT to break away from old reliances on twisted pair cable connections, which have increased considerably in price in recent times.

“The costs rose from something like $80 per pair to circa $130, which meant looking for an alternative,” says Rausch. “At that point it’s a case of either dealing with a phone company, putting cables in yourself, or doing something else entirely.”

The last option is the one New York went for, with TransCore putting out an RFP (request for proposal) for a city-wide network for data services. The result was the NYCWiN with TransCore working with the winning supplier 4057 Northrop Grumman to provide a secure connection to the city’s TMC.

However, it is New York’s advanced solid state traffic controllers (ASTCs) that Rausch repeatedly comes back to as the “key platform”.
 
The ASTCs, supplied by 7196 Peek Traffic US, are a bespoke design for New York, but compliant with NTCIP communications standards and based on ATC controller standards.

The city has procured around 10,000 of these units so far and is expected to have them at all 12,000 of its intersections in due course.

“The controllers support interval and phase-based operation and give one heck of a lot of computational capability in the field,” Rausch says.

“All of the building blocks are parallel efforts, all parts of an overall plan,” he continues. “The controllers, for instance, are a key part of the overall effort because without these, there would be little we could do for advancing traffic control in the city.”

Procurement of the ASTCs has been done gradually, in phases numbering several thousand units at a time, which has helped NYCDOT secure a very good price, says Rausch. The phased introduction has also necessitated recognition of legacy systems and the need for compatibility with older controllers.

“The game plan included transitioning,” Rausch says. This has included feeding back to NTCIP working groups details on the systems running the city’s Midtown in Motion project, because these standards previously did not support the concept of adaptive control. “Nothing here is secretive or proprietary. Bidding for software and installations is open,” Rausch adds.

“New York has done some very advanced things, but the greatest challenge is perhaps dealing with the implications of the magnitude of the overall system. With 12,000 intersections it is not unusual to have 30 to 50 fail in one day for whatever reason. The big challenge is keeping the system running. Operators have to be given the tools to be responsive in troubleshooting problems.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • UK city to introduce thermal imaging traffic management
    March 24, 2016
    City of York Council is to introduce thermal imaging technology on key cycle routes in York to help reduce the time spent at traffic signals, improve journey reliability and cycle safety. The city is set to become one of the first councils in the country to start using the technology which will accurately detect cyclists at signals by their ‘heat signature’, allowing the signals to react accordingly and be adjusted to give more ‘green time’ for cyclists. The thermal technology was first introduced by
  • Use of AI, unlocking innovation - and new political leaders: our experts pick out 2025's key drivers
    December 30, 2024
    Is predicting the future doomed to failure? Not when ITS International's experts are on the case...
  • To charge or not to charge, that is the question
    January 26, 2018
    Alan Dron looks at why congestion charging and other similar schemes are so controversial in North America. In August, Andrew Cuomo, governor of New York State, described congestion charging for the city as “an idea whose time had come,” according to the Bloomberg wire service. In October, he announced a ‘Fix NYC’ advisory panel to study methods of easing congestion on the city’s streets. Although Cuomo did not specifically mention congestion charging when setting up the panel, he said it would study
  • Taking the long view of ITS
    March 24, 2015
    Caroline Visser believes the ITS industry must present a coherent case for consideration of the technology to become part of transport policy and planning. As ITS advisor and road finance director for the International Road Federation (IRF) in Geneva, Caroline Visser is well placed to evaluate quantifying the benefits of ITS implementation – a topic about which there is little agreement and even less consistency. She is pressing to get some consistency in the evaluation of ITS deployments through the use of