Skip to main content

USDOT makes funds available to strengthen transit safety

The U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is making US$21.9 million available to help strengthen public transportation safety for millions of passengers and transit workers nationwide. In addition, the agency also announced a flexible new policy, known as safety management systems (SMS), which the USDOT has officially adopted to help guide states and transit agencies in managing safety risks in a proactive, cost-effective way.
May 15, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
The 324 US Department of Transportation's (DOT) 2023 Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is making US$21.9 million available to help strengthen public transportation safety for millions of passengers and transit workers nationwide.

In addition, the agency also announced a flexible new policy, known as safety management systems (SMS), which the USDOT has officially adopted to help guide states and transit agencies in managing safety risks in a proactive, cost-effective way.

SMS is a collaborative approach that brings management and labour together to build on the transit industry's existing safety foundation to control risk better, detect and correct safety problems earlier, share and analyse safety data more effectively and measure safety performance more carefully.

These efforts reflect the FTA's commitment to begin implementing long-sought federal authority for transit safety granted under the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) and help states and transit agencies begin meeting new safety-related responsibilities, representing a shift in the way FTA and states will work together to ensure the safety of public transportation across the nation.

"Maintaining the safety of our nation's transportation systems has always been our number-one priority," said US Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. "We take our new responsibility to oversee transit safety as seriously as we do for railways, roadways, runways and we will continue to find innovative ways to make transit even safer for the public and our workforce.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Gearing up for IntelliDrive cooperative traffic management
    February 1, 2012
    Beginning in the first quarter of 2010 it became evident that the IntelliDrivesm programme direction had been reestablished, by the USDOT's ITS Joint Program Office (JPO), after being adrift for a few years. The programme was now moving toward a deployment future and with a much broader stakeholder involvement than it had exhibited previously. By today not only is it evident that the programme was reestablished with a renewed emphasis on deployment, it is also apparent that it is moving along at a faster pa
  • Shailen Bhatt: Invest in America Act ‘critical' for VRU safety
    June 5, 2020
    ITS America president welcomes new legislation - particularly its potential for reducing road deaths
  • Solving Detroit’s jams: just ask a Michigan student
    October 17, 2019
    At the Institute of Transportation Engineers annual meeting, a clever student plan to reduce commute times in Detroit suggests the future of the ITS industry is in good hands, write Pete Spiller and Jarrod Cady A team of students from the University of Michigan won a national student Transportation Technology Tournament - sponsored by the National Operations Center of Excellence (NOCoE) and the US Department of Transportation - with a compelling presentation on reducing congestion. In an impressive d
  • Legalities of in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures
    February 1, 2012
    Paul Laurenza of Dykema Gossett PLLC discusses the paths which lawmakers may go down on the route to making in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures a reality. The question of whether or not to mandate in-vehicle systems for safety and other applications is a vexed one. There is a presumption on some parts that going down the road of forcing systems' fitment is somehow too domineering or restricting. Others would argue that it is the only realistic way of ensuring that systems achieve widespread d