Skip to main content

UK to allow Huawei into ‘non-core’ 5G network

The UK government is set to allow telecoms group Huawei to help develop the country’s 5G network – although the firm will not be able to work in ‘core’ areas.
By Adam Hill January 30, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
ID 169627799 © Daniel Constante | Dreamstime.com

5G is going to be crucial for the safety and efficiency of connected vehicles, among other ITS technologies.

The advice from UK ministers follows a meeting of the country’s National Security Council – despite objections from US president Donald Trump, who has suggested that US allies should not use the Chinese company.

Victor Zhang, vice president of Huawei, said the company was “reassured by the UK government’s confirmation that we can continue working with our customers to keep the 5G roll-out on track”.

The UK says that ‘high risk’ vendors should be subject to a number of restrictions – for example, being excluded from “all safety-related and safety-critical networks” and “security critical ‘core’ functions”, and barred from “sensitive geographic locations, such as nuclear sites and military bases”. Companies such as Huawei should also not have more than 35% of the access network, which connects “devices and equipment to mobile phone masts”.

Veteran US politician Newt Gingrich tweeted that the decision was a ‘major defeat’ for the US. “How big does Huawei have to get and how many countries have to sign with Huawei for the US government to realize we are losing the internet to China?” he asked. 

Zhang says that Huawei has “supplied cutting-edge technology to telecoms operators in the UK for more than 15 years”. He added: "We agree a diverse vendor market and fair competition are essential for network reliability and innovation, as well as ensuring consumers have access to the best possible technology."
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The move towards shared telematics platforms
    February 27, 2013
    Is the end for dedicated, in-vehicle telematics systems now in sight? Some seemed to think so at the recent Telematics Munich 2012 conference… Geoff Hadwick reports. Forget smartphone apps – leave that sort of thing to Apple and Google,” Roger Lanctot, associate director of the global automotive practice at consultancy Strategy Analytics told more than 700 delegates in Munich last month at the Telematics Munich 2012 conference. They are a waste of time and money, he said. Forget putting too much data on das
  • Big wheels keep on turnin’
    August 21, 2018
    Many of the great and the good in the global mobility sector gathered at this year’s Movin’ On event in Montreal. Measured regulation of technologies and safety issues were major themes, reports David Arminas. *Bibendum is the original name for the Michelin Man, the symbol of the Michelin tyre company Autonomous vehicles, platooning, smart intersections and safety – these were the talking points over two-and-a-half days of the Movin’ On event in Montreal, Canada. Everyone in the mobility sector is at the
  • Cost benefit goes under the microscope
    August 21, 2017
    Conventional cost benefit analysis (CBA) of plans for urban smart mobility initiatives needs serious rethinking, according to a recently-completed European study. The three-year Evidence Project (the Project) emerged in response to concerns about the availability and quality of documented research – including CBA – required to prove that investment in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) can be economically beneficial. Covering 22 sectors ranging from electric vehicles to shared spaces, the Project clai
  • Debating road user charging systems
    January 26, 2012
    Are pre-launch trials of charging systems the way to improve public acceptance? Or is the real key a more robust political attitude? Here, leading system suppliers discuss the issue. The use of distance-based Road User Charging (RUC) is now well established, at least for heavy goods vehicles on strategic roads. However demand management for all vehicles, whether a distance-based charge or some form of cordon scheme, has yet to make significant progress. This is in spite of the logic and equity of RUC being