Skip to main content

UK to allow Huawei into ‘non-core’ 5G network

The UK government is set to allow telecoms group Huawei to help develop the country’s 5G network – although the firm will not be able to work in ‘core’ areas.
By Adam Hill January 30, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
ID 169627799 © Daniel Constante | Dreamstime.com

5G is going to be crucial for the safety and efficiency of connected vehicles, among other ITS technologies.

The advice from UK ministers follows a meeting of the country’s National Security Council – despite objections from US president Donald Trump, who has suggested that US allies should not use the Chinese company.

Victor Zhang, vice president of Huawei, said the company was “reassured by the UK government’s confirmation that we can continue working with our customers to keep the 5G roll-out on track”.

The UK says that ‘high risk’ vendors should be subject to a number of restrictions – for example, being excluded from “all safety-related and safety-critical networks” and “security critical ‘core’ functions”, and barred from “sensitive geographic locations, such as nuclear sites and military bases”. Companies such as Huawei should also not have more than 35% of the access network, which connects “devices and equipment to mobile phone masts”.

Veteran US politician Newt Gingrich tweeted that the decision was a ‘major defeat’ for the US. “How big does Huawei have to get and how many countries have to sign with Huawei for the US government to realize we are losing the internet to China?” he asked. 

Zhang says that Huawei has “supplied cutting-edge technology to telecoms operators in the UK for more than 15 years”. He added: "We agree a diverse vendor market and fair competition are essential for network reliability and innovation, as well as ensuring consumers have access to the best possible technology."
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • UK smart motorways scrapped due to 'lack of public confidence'
    April 17, 2023
    'Pause' on roll-out has been made permanent - with £1bn cost also cited as a factor
  • Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    January 16, 2012
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst
  • ITS World Congress debates perceptions of enforcement
    December 4, 2012
    The technical programme of this year’s ITS World Congress in Vienna includes a special session on the image of enforcement. ITS International examines the scale of the problem and what can be done about it. Debate on the merits and difficulties of enforcing speed limits appears centred on a conflict of principles. Put very simply, local communities, people living close to busy or hazardous roads, want to see traffic speeds calmed. Drivers on those roads, on the whole, want their principle of freedom to be m
  • Debating the future of in-vehicle systems
    December 6, 2012
    Industry experts talk to Jason Barnes about the legislative situation of current and future in-vehicle systems. Articles about technology development can have a tendency to reference Moore’s Law with almost indecent regularity and haste but the fact remains that despite predictions of slow-down or plateauing, the pace remains unrelenting. That juxtaposes with a common tendency within the ITS industry: to concentrate on the technology and assume that much else – legislation, business cases and so on – will m