Skip to main content

Transit 'unprepared' for cyberattack, says MTI

Four in 10 agencies do not have cybersecurity action plan in place, researchers find
By Adam Hill October 9, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
More than half of transit agencies ignore basic anti-hacking requirements (© Daniil Peshkov | Dreamstime.com)

Research from the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) has found that US transit agencies are not properly prepared for the potential havoc wreaked by hackers.

The report - Policy Recommendation to Enhance Surface Transit Cyber Preparedness – surveyed 90 transit agency technology leaders.

It uncovered a mismatch between approaches and attitudes: although 80% of agencies said they felt prepared, just 60% of those questioned actually have a cybersecurity preparedness plan.

This suggests complacency and a lack of readiness to face problems: MTI says most transit agencies “do not have many of the basic policies or personnel in place to respond to a cyber incident”.

This is particularly significant because the US Department of Homeland Security – which part-funds MTI - has designated the transportation as one of 16 critical infrastructure sectors whose disruption would have a debilitating effect on the country’s security.

MTI, based at San Jose State University, points out that resources to combat hack attacks are ‘scarce’ for transit agencies, which means “there needs to be a collaborative effort from the federal government, the industry, and agency leadership to establish, maintain and refine cybersecurity programmes”.

Researchers insist, however, that transit operators must adopt and implement minimum cybersecurity standards before receiving cash from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA).

The report found that more than half of agencies ignore “one of the most basic cybersecurity preparedness requirements” by failing to keep a log for longer than 12 months.

In addition, 36% do not have a cyber disaster recovery plan and 67% do not have a cyber crisis communications plan.

Help is at hand. The report’s principal investigator, Scott Belcher, says: “Fortunately, there is an abundance of information and tools, such as the Transportation Systems Sector (TSS) Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance and accompanying workbook, available to public transit agencies to support a cybersecurity programme.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Connecting DoTs with IoT for secure, connected transportation systems
    January 11, 2022
    Michelle Maggiore of Cisco outlines how connected roadways and intersections can help improve safety, reduce traffic congestion, and minimise our carbon footprint
  • Smart cities - better world, says A-to-Be
    May 19, 2020
    Smart city adoption in the US has been sluggish, thinks Jason Wall of A-to-Be USA. But there is still time to learn lessons from the European experience...
  • VRU safety report urges enforcement
    March 18, 2020
    Enforcement must be at the heart of a drive to reduce vulnerable road user deaths and injuries, says the latest report from the European Transport Safety Council. Its facts and figures give authorities the justification to invest more in camera technology and other ITS solutions
  • 'No lack of political drive' on ITS
    June 11, 2012
    This issue of ITS International contains a feature article based on interviews with leading figures of the ITS associations of the United States, Europe, Japan and Malaysia. A key point made is the importance of political leadership or policy direction in driving take up and implementation of ITS technology. This industry actually need not complain of a lack of drive on the part of politicians, or so it seems from other projects reported in this issue. True, the US would welcome a new transport bill and the