Skip to main content

Transit 'unprepared' for cyberattack, says MTI

Four in 10 agencies do not have cybersecurity action plan in place, researchers find
By Adam Hill October 9, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
More than half of transit agencies ignore basic anti-hacking requirements (© Daniil Peshkov | Dreamstime.com)

Research from the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) has found that US transit agencies are not properly prepared for the potential havoc wreaked by hackers.

The report - Policy Recommendation to Enhance Surface Transit Cyber Preparedness – surveyed 90 transit agency technology leaders.

It uncovered a mismatch between approaches and attitudes: although 80% of agencies said they felt prepared, just 60% of those questioned actually have a cybersecurity preparedness plan.

This suggests complacency and a lack of readiness to face problems: MTI says most transit agencies “do not have many of the basic policies or personnel in place to respond to a cyber incident”.

This is particularly significant because the US Department of Homeland Security – which part-funds MTI - has designated the transportation as one of 16 critical infrastructure sectors whose disruption would have a debilitating effect on the country’s security.

MTI, based at San Jose State University, points out that resources to combat hack attacks are ‘scarce’ for transit agencies, which means “there needs to be a collaborative effort from the federal government, the industry, and agency leadership to establish, maintain and refine cybersecurity programmes”.

Researchers insist, however, that transit operators must adopt and implement minimum cybersecurity standards before receiving cash from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA).

The report found that more than half of agencies ignore “one of the most basic cybersecurity preparedness requirements” by failing to keep a log for longer than 12 months.

In addition, 36% do not have a cyber disaster recovery plan and 67% do not have a cyber crisis communications plan.

Help is at hand. The report’s principal investigator, Scott Belcher, says: “Fortunately, there is an abundance of information and tools, such as the Transportation Systems Sector (TSS) Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance and accompanying workbook, available to public transit agencies to support a cybersecurity programme.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Reducing incident clear up times, saving money
    January 24, 2012
    In 2007 in Atlanta, Georgia, it took over four hours to open the road after a major commercial vehicle incident. Not any more. Four years ago the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) cited Atlanta, Georgia as the third-most congested city in the United States. Each traveller in metro Atlanta lost an incredible 57 hours a year to traffic delays, wasting 40 gallons of fuel while sitting in traffic. In 2007, it took nearly four and a half hours to open travel lanes after an average tractor-trailer incident. Th
  • Cybersecurity in the connected car
    March 31, 2017
    A new report by Danish business analysis company Autintelligence, Cybersecurity in the connected car: technology, industry, and future examines the security implications of increasing connectivity and software complexity in connected and autonomous vehicles. According to the report, advanced connectivity, electronics and software are hallmarks of modern vehicles. A typical connected car contains up to 70 ECUs, and about 100 million lines of code. As vehicles expand in terms of technological complexity,
  • Preparing for unpredictable precipitation
    August 18, 2015
    ITS solutions are helping streamline winter road maintenance for Delaware and Illinois, two states that must deal with dynamic weather and varying snowfall totals. Andrew Bardin Williams reports. Wilmington and Newark (pronounced new-ark) are two vastly different cities that sit on opposite ends of Delaware. Newark is a sleepy university town of roughly 30,000 residents abutting the state’s western border with Maryland and Pennsylvania, and often gets confused with its larger namesake in New Jersey.
  • Grey areas: who's legally responsible for C/AVs?
    October 22, 2018
    Connected and autonomous vehicles are an exciting development in the ITS sector – but amid the hype some big questions about their deployment remain unanswered, finds Ben Spencer Connected and autonomous vehicles (C/AVs) have the potential to change the way we travel - and to eliminate road fatalities. But policy makers and regulators will need to ensure user and public safety is included in future planning. The legal and insurance industries will have to catch up, too. For example, questions over who is