Skip to main content

Transit 'unprepared' for cyberattack, says MTI

Four in 10 agencies do not have cybersecurity action plan in place, researchers find
By Adam Hill October 9, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
More than half of transit agencies ignore basic anti-hacking requirements (© Daniil Peshkov | Dreamstime.com)

Research from the Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) has found that US transit agencies are not properly prepared for the potential havoc wreaked by hackers.

The report - Policy Recommendation to Enhance Surface Transit Cyber Preparedness – surveyed 90 transit agency technology leaders.

It uncovered a mismatch between approaches and attitudes: although 80% of agencies said they felt prepared, just 60% of those questioned actually have a cybersecurity preparedness plan.

This suggests complacency and a lack of readiness to face problems: MTI says most transit agencies “do not have many of the basic policies or personnel in place to respond to a cyber incident”.

This is particularly significant because the US Department of Homeland Security – which part-funds MTI - has designated the transportation as one of 16 critical infrastructure sectors whose disruption would have a debilitating effect on the country’s security.

MTI, based at San Jose State University, points out that resources to combat hack attacks are ‘scarce’ for transit agencies, which means “there needs to be a collaborative effort from the federal government, the industry, and agency leadership to establish, maintain and refine cybersecurity programmes”.

Researchers insist, however, that transit operators must adopt and implement minimum cybersecurity standards before receiving cash from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA).

The report found that more than half of agencies ignore “one of the most basic cybersecurity preparedness requirements” by failing to keep a log for longer than 12 months.

In addition, 36% do not have a cyber disaster recovery plan and 67% do not have a cyber crisis communications plan.

Help is at hand. The report’s principal investigator, Scott Belcher, says: “Fortunately, there is an abundance of information and tools, such as the Transportation Systems Sector (TSS) Cybersecurity Framework Implementation Guidance and accompanying workbook, available to public transit agencies to support a cybersecurity programme.”

Related Content

  • January 24, 2012
    Underinvestment in infrastructure threatens economic growth
    The 2011 Urban Mobility Report from the Texas Transportation Institute highlights the dangers of continued underinvestment in transportation infrastructure but also offers some hope in terms of possible solutions
  • January 4, 2024
    The future? It's remote, says Valerann
    More responsive traffic management is of enormous value – and Valerann thinks its SaaS system, remotely deployed in Latin America, is able to identify incidents much more quickly, finds Andrew Stone
  • February 2, 2012
    Economic crisis needs non-partisan perspectives to stimulate growth
    Kary Witt, President of the IBTTA and Pat Jones, Executive Director and CEO, talk about the need to put aside partisan perspectives in order to deal with the current economic crisis
  • April 18, 2012
    EV charging will require increased investment in cyber security systems
    The technology architecture associated with electric vehicle (EV) charging is continuing to evolve as utilities and other key players in the industry ecosystem identify business requirements and risks associated with adding significant new demands on the electrical grid. One of the most pressing challenges is related to securing financial transactions and end-to-end communications throughout the EV charging infrastructure, and a recent report from Pike Research indicates that these areas will be the focus o