Skip to main content

Singapore - still very smart, says new index

The smarter the city, the better the Covid-19 response is likely to be, report finds
By Adam Hill September 21, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Smart cities - are they really better at responding to Covid pandemic? (© Melinda Nagy | Dreamstime.com)

Singapore, Helsinki and Zurich have been given the highest rankings in the 2020 Smart City Index - with Singapore top of the pile for the second year running.

The index of 109 cities is put together by the Institute for Management Development (IMD) with Singapore University for Technology and Design (SUTD) and grades cities based on economic and technological data - as well as by their citizens’ perceptions of how 'smart' the cities are.

In each city, 120 citizens were asked questions in April and May this year on technological provisions in five areas: health and safety, mobility, activities, opportunities and governance. 

This means that big initiatives such as adding free WiFi to a city - as happened in Medellín - is likely to make a sizeable impact on the rankings: the Colombian city moved up 19 places this year.

The report's authors also highlight the development of 'second cities' compared to capitals, pointing out that Bilbao has done better than Madrid in Spain, and that Birmingham, UK, has moved more places up the scale than London this year.

It also suggests that giving more power to local authorities is a good thing and - perhaps not surprisingly - indicates that smarter cities will be able to handle the current pandemic better than others.

“It is of course too early to draw final lessons from Covid,” said Bruno Lanvin, president of the IMD Smart City Observatory, which began publishing the index in 2019. 

“However, it is clear that we are at a critical juncture, where the health crisis is still very much with us, while the economic and social crisis that it will entail has hardly started.”

Lanvin continues: "The cities that have been able to combine technologies, leadership and a strong culture of ‘living and acting together’ should be able to better withstand the most damaging effects of such crises.”

Professor Arturo Bris, director of the IMD World Competitiveness Center, said that while smart cities are not the solution, technology certainly helps.

Related Content

  • TomTom: Congestion costs on UK businesses increase by £148m
    December 14, 2017
    UK Congestion is costing businesses £915m ($1,229m) a year in lost productivity, according to the latest figures revealed by TomTom’s (TT’s) Traffic Index. Findings showed this figure is an increase of £148m ($198m) from last year’s £767m ($1,030m).
  • StreetLight's figures highlight Covid effect
    July 15, 2022
    Traffic data provides insights which can be used for planning and BIL investment
  • No evidence California cellphone ban decreased accidents, says researcher
    July 18, 2014
    In a recent study, a researcher at the University of Colorado Boulder found no evidence that a California ban on using hand-held cellphones while driving decreased the number of traffic accidents in the state in the first six months following the ban. The findings, published in the journal Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, are surprising given prior research that suggests driving while using a cellphone is risky; past laboratory studies have shown that people who talk on a cellphone wh
  • Inrix identifies the worst traffic hotspots in the 25 most congested US cities
    September 28, 2017
    Inrix has published its latest research on the worst traffic hotspots in America. Using Inrix Roadway Analytics, a cloud-based traffic analysis tool, Inrix analysed and ranked more than 100,000 traffic hotspots in the 25 most congested US cities. The economic cost of hotspots was also calculated in terms of wasted time, lost fuel and carbon emissions over the next decade. The research identified and ranked 108,000 traffic hotspots in the 25 most congested cities in the US identified by the INRIX Global T