Skip to main content

Singapore - still very smart, says new index

The smarter the city, the better the Covid-19 response is likely to be, report finds
By Adam Hill September 21, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Smart cities - are they really better at responding to Covid pandemic? (© Melinda Nagy | Dreamstime.com)

Singapore, Helsinki and Zurich have been given the highest rankings in the 2020 Smart City Index - with Singapore top of the pile for the second year running.

The index of 109 cities is put together by the Institute for Management Development (IMD) with Singapore University for Technology and Design (SUTD) and grades cities based on economic and technological data - as well as by their citizens’ perceptions of how 'smart' the cities are.

In each city, 120 citizens were asked questions in April and May this year on technological provisions in five areas: health and safety, mobility, activities, opportunities and governance. 

This means that big initiatives such as adding free WiFi to a city - as happened in Medellín - is likely to make a sizeable impact on the rankings: the Colombian city moved up 19 places this year.

The report's authors also highlight the development of 'second cities' compared to capitals, pointing out that Bilbao has done better than Madrid in Spain, and that Birmingham, UK, has moved more places up the scale than London this year.

It also suggests that giving more power to local authorities is a good thing and - perhaps not surprisingly - indicates that smarter cities will be able to handle the current pandemic better than others.

“It is of course too early to draw final lessons from Covid,” said Bruno Lanvin, president of the IMD Smart City Observatory, which began publishing the index in 2019. 

“However, it is clear that we are at a critical juncture, where the health crisis is still very much with us, while the economic and social crisis that it will entail has hardly started.”

Lanvin continues: "The cities that have been able to combine technologies, leadership and a strong culture of ‘living and acting together’ should be able to better withstand the most damaging effects of such crises.”

Professor Arturo Bris, director of the IMD World Competitiveness Center, said that while smart cities are not the solution, technology certainly helps.

Related Content

  • Mobility itself is moving says cubic
    June 9, 2015
    Cubic’s Chris Bax looks at the challenges and benefits of implementing transport as a service. Imagine paying for travel in exactly the same way you buy your phone service. For example, you would pay a set amount in exchange for a monthly travel package covering up to 100km of free taxi journeys in your home city (including a guaranteed 15 minute pickup) and public transport usage within a 1,500km radius of your home. Not only would this option be cheaper than owning and maintaining your own car, you would
  • Sampo Hietanen on MaaS: “We needed better dreams”
    March 6, 2023
    Sampo Hietanen, founder of MaaS Global, is one of the authors of the Mobility as a Service concept: the dream is still real, but MaaS needs to evolve, he insists
  • EU mobility’s Covid escape route
    July 29, 2021
    European Union roads could be more resilient after the pandemic ends, thanks to the goal of creating a more integrated mobility network, says ERF’s José Diez
  • Getting to the point
    September 4, 2018
    Cars are starting to learn to understand the language of pointing – something that our closest relative, the chimpanzee, cannot do. And such image recognition technology has profound mobility implications, says Nils Lenke Pointing at objects – be it with language, using gaze, gestures or eyes only – is a very human ability. However, recent advances in technology have enabled smart, multimodal assistants - including those found in cars - to action similar pointing capabilities and replicate these human qual