Skip to main content

Singapore - still very smart, says new index

The smarter the city, the better the Covid-19 response is likely to be, report finds
By Adam Hill September 21, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Smart cities - are they really better at responding to Covid pandemic? (© Melinda Nagy | Dreamstime.com)

Singapore, Helsinki and Zurich have been given the highest rankings in the 2020 Smart City Index - with Singapore top of the pile for the second year running.

The index of 109 cities is put together by the Institute for Management Development (IMD) with Singapore University for Technology and Design (SUTD) and grades cities based on economic and technological data - as well as by their citizens’ perceptions of how 'smart' the cities are.

In each city, 120 citizens were asked questions in April and May this year on technological provisions in five areas: health and safety, mobility, activities, opportunities and governance. 

This means that big initiatives such as adding free WiFi to a city - as happened in Medellín - is likely to make a sizeable impact on the rankings: the Colombian city moved up 19 places this year.

The report's authors also highlight the development of 'second cities' compared to capitals, pointing out that Bilbao has done better than Madrid in Spain, and that Birmingham, UK, has moved more places up the scale than London this year.

It also suggests that giving more power to local authorities is a good thing and - perhaps not surprisingly - indicates that smarter cities will be able to handle the current pandemic better than others.

“It is of course too early to draw final lessons from Covid,” said Bruno Lanvin, president of the IMD Smart City Observatory, which began publishing the index in 2019. 

“However, it is clear that we are at a critical juncture, where the health crisis is still very much with us, while the economic and social crisis that it will entail has hardly started.”

Lanvin continues: "The cities that have been able to combine technologies, leadership and a strong culture of ‘living and acting together’ should be able to better withstand the most damaging effects of such crises.”

Professor Arturo Bris, director of the IMD World Competitiveness Center, said that while smart cities are not the solution, technology certainly helps.

Related Content

  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t
  • A need for order in evolution
    February 27, 2012
    The hit film Jurassic Park took its name from one of the several geological periods or epochs (as they are also known) in which dinosaurs were the dominant land-dwellers.
  • US closer to finalising a new reauthorisation bill
    January 25, 2012
    Pete Goldin talks with ITS America about the continuing efforts of US Congress to finalise a transportation reauthorisation bill and how this will impact the ITS industry
  • Cost benefit analysis ‘can’t be carried out with a cookbook’
    June 25, 2018
    There is far more to working out the worth of a project than simply filling in a few headings on a spreadsheet. David Crawford surveys some recent thinking from the US and Canada. Cost benefit analysis (CBA) “can’t be carried out with a cookbook”, warns US analyst Professor Robert J Brent. “ You can’t just get out a spreadsheet and fill in the data for all the headings. Each transport CBA should have something that is distinctive, in terms of location (for example, for a rural area), types of user