Skip to main content

Lidar more use in ADAS than AVs, says Cepton

Silicon Valley start-up says it is already deploying Lidar with automotive manufacturers
By Adam Hill September 18, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Cepton is using Lidar as a safety feature, as with intersection vehicle tracking

Lidar is better-suited at present as a key element in advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) rather than as a game-changer for the development of autonomous vehicles (AVs).

That is the view of Dr Jun Pei, boss of Silicon Valley start-up Cepton Technologies, in an interview with ITS International.

Pei, an engineer by training who used to work at Lidar inventor Velodyne, insists it makes sense to be focused more on ADAS than AVs at present.

“Do I see AVs at Level 4 out there next year?" he asks. "No, I don't. The next two years? No I don’t. Five years? No I don’t. I don't have a lot of ‘five years’ in my career or in my life - I'm very impatient person. I'm here to make a profitable business for everybody around me.”

So ADAS will be the focus for Cepton’s Lidar business – for reasons of scale as much as anything else. 

“I am a true believer in the future: radar, camera and Lidar - these three devices - will coexist on all cars,”  Pei says.

Cepton says it is already deploying Lidar with automotive manufacturers but cannot reveal details. 

It will be a few years yet but “this is not some AV demonstration from a start-up company: this is something you can actually use your money to buy, from a dealership, that has Cepton Lidar in it”.

“As it becomes mature and the cost becomes reasonably low, Lidar will actually become a critical safety sensor that can cover many, many things that the radar and the camera cannot cover," he goes on.

Cepton is partnering with Koito, the biggest headlamp provider in the world, making 60-70% of all the headlamps for Japanese cars. “We have the technology developed, based on ADAS, for which we own the patent,” Pei explains. 

Concentrating on ADAS rather than AVs was an unfashionable position in 2016, he recalls: “We were, literally, the laughing stock of the industry because we were not on the bandwagon of AVs; everybody was saying Level 4 would be there by 2018.” He pauses. “And now it’s 2020.”

Read the full interview in the September/October edition of ITS International

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Cost benefit goes under the microscope
    August 21, 2017
    Conventional cost benefit analysis (CBA) of plans for urban smart mobility initiatives needs serious rethinking, according to a recently-completed European study. The three-year Evidence Project (the Project) emerged in response to concerns about the availability and quality of documented research – including CBA – required to prove that investment in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) can be economically beneficial. Covering 22 sectors ranging from electric vehicles to shared spaces, the Project clai
  • Demand management schemes, is there a better way?
    January 31, 2012
    The European Commission is placing too much emphasis on the use of demand management, according to the FIA. Here, Wil Botman, Director-General of the FIA's European Bureau, explains why. Towards the end of last year, the European Bureau of the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) released a statement which criticised the European Commission's (EC's) approach to urban traffic congestion following the adoption of the Action Plan on Urban Mobility. In particular, the FIA voiced concerns over what it
  • AVs and poor weather – a bad mix
    May 11, 2020
    The US DoT has produced a report on how adverse weather and road conditions will affect automated vehicles – it found inconsistency between different cars with these features which are already on highways and suggests limitations are not yet understood
  • Open data gives new lease of life to public travel information screens
    March 4, 2014
    David Crawford finds resurgent interest in travel information screens for buildings. With city governments worldwide increasingly opening up and sharing their public transport data for general use, attention is focusing on the potential financial benefits – to transit operators and businesses more widely. Professor Stephen Goldsmith, who directs the US’ Harvard University’s Data-Smart City Solutions Project says: “Amid nationwide public-sector budget cuts, open data is providing a road map for improving tra