Skip to main content

Lidar more use in ADAS than AVs, says Cepton

Silicon Valley start-up says it is already deploying Lidar with automotive manufacturers
By Adam Hill September 18, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Cepton is using Lidar as a safety feature, as with intersection vehicle tracking

Lidar is better-suited at present as a key element in advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) rather than as a game-changer for the development of autonomous vehicles (AVs).

That is the view of Dr Jun Pei, boss of Silicon Valley start-up Cepton Technologies, in an interview with ITS International.

Pei, an engineer by training who used to work at Lidar inventor Velodyne, insists it makes sense to be focused more on ADAS than AVs at present.

“Do I see AVs at Level 4 out there next year?" he asks. "No, I don't. The next two years? No I don’t. Five years? No I don’t. I don't have a lot of ‘five years’ in my career or in my life - I'm very impatient person. I'm here to make a profitable business for everybody around me.”

So ADAS will be the focus for Cepton’s Lidar business – for reasons of scale as much as anything else. 

“I am a true believer in the future: radar, camera and Lidar - these three devices - will coexist on all cars,”  Pei says.

Cepton says it is already deploying Lidar with automotive manufacturers but cannot reveal details. 

It will be a few years yet but “this is not some AV demonstration from a start-up company: this is something you can actually use your money to buy, from a dealership, that has Cepton Lidar in it”.

“As it becomes mature and the cost becomes reasonably low, Lidar will actually become a critical safety sensor that can cover many, many things that the radar and the camera cannot cover," he goes on.

Cepton is partnering with Koito, the biggest headlamp provider in the world, making 60-70% of all the headlamps for Japanese cars. “We have the technology developed, based on ADAS, for which we own the patent,” Pei explains. 

Concentrating on ADAS rather than AVs was an unfashionable position in 2016, he recalls: “We were, literally, the laughing stock of the industry because we were not on the bandwagon of AVs; everybody was saying Level 4 would be there by 2018.” He pauses. “And now it’s 2020.”

Read the full interview in the September/October edition of ITS International

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Rio’s TMC rises to Olympic challenge
    October 27, 2016
    Timothy Compston lifts the lid on Rio de Janeiro’s preparations for keeping its transport systems moving during the Olympics – and the outcome. Hosting the Olympics poses major traffic management challenges for any city and Rio was no exception – especially as it is already one of the world’s most congested cities. Beyond its normal 6.5 million inhabitants wanting to carry on their daily lives, in August Rio was also home to 11,300 athletes from 206 countries. Athletes who, without fail, had to reach their
  • Crossing the line: managing traffic across jurisdictions
    June 18, 2024
    The US will eventually have a fully-digitised transportation network, with traffic management devices talking to each other across massive distances. It’s really a question of pain points on the road to full deployment, explains Mark Talbot of Q-Free
  • C-ITS in the EU: ‘It has got a little tribal recently’
    April 16, 2019
    As the C-ITS Delegated Act begins its journey through the European policy maze, Adam Hill looks at who is expecting what from this proposed framework for connected vehicles – and why some people are insisting that the lawmakers are already getting things wrong
  • Loop detection still has a part in traffic management
    March 2, 2012
    Bob Lees, co-founder of Diamond Consulting Services, on why the loop detector just refuses to go away. The more strident proponents of newer and emergent detection technologies are quick to highlight what they see as the disadvantages, and hence the imminent passing, of the humble inductive loop. The more prosaic will acknowledge that loops continue to have a part to play in traffic management, falling back on the assertion that it is all a question of application. And yet year after year the loop, despite