Skip to main content

Lidar more use in ADAS than AVs, says Cepton

Silicon Valley start-up says it is already deploying Lidar with automotive manufacturers
By Adam Hill September 18, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Cepton is using Lidar as a safety feature, as with intersection vehicle tracking

Lidar is better-suited at present as a key element in advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) rather than as a game-changer for the development of autonomous vehicles (AVs).

That is the view of Dr Jun Pei, boss of Silicon Valley start-up Cepton Technologies, in an interview with ITS International.

Pei, an engineer by training who used to work at Lidar inventor Velodyne, insists it makes sense to be focused more on ADAS than AVs at present.

“Do I see AVs at Level 4 out there next year?" he asks. "No, I don't. The next two years? No I don’t. Five years? No I don’t. I don't have a lot of ‘five years’ in my career or in my life - I'm very impatient person. I'm here to make a profitable business for everybody around me.”

So ADAS will be the focus for Cepton’s Lidar business – for reasons of scale as much as anything else. 

“I am a true believer in the future: radar, camera and Lidar - these three devices - will coexist on all cars,”  Pei says.

Cepton says it is already deploying Lidar with automotive manufacturers but cannot reveal details. 

It will be a few years yet but “this is not some AV demonstration from a start-up company: this is something you can actually use your money to buy, from a dealership, that has Cepton Lidar in it”.

“As it becomes mature and the cost becomes reasonably low, Lidar will actually become a critical safety sensor that can cover many, many things that the radar and the camera cannot cover," he goes on.

Cepton is partnering with Koito, the biggest headlamp provider in the world, making 60-70% of all the headlamps for Japanese cars. “We have the technology developed, based on ADAS, for which we own the patent,” Pei explains. 

Concentrating on ADAS rather than AVs was an unfashionable position in 2016, he recalls: “We were, literally, the laughing stock of the industry because we were not on the bandwagon of AVs; everybody was saying Level 4 would be there by 2018.” He pauses. “And now it’s 2020.”

Read the full interview in the September/October edition of ITS International

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Carlos Moreno: ‘I’ve had a lot of death threats over 15-minute cities’
    May 4, 2023
    Carlos Moreno, inventor of the 15-minute city concept, talks to Adam Hill about misinformation, conspiracy theories and the attraction of ‘human smart cities’
  • “For a city to be loveable, the car has to be a guest”: EmpowerWISM winner Kari Anne Solfjeld Eid
    March 1, 2023
    Kari Anne Solfjeld Eid, founder of e-cargo bike subscription service Whee!, has won the Empower Women in Shared Mobility 2023 programme. She tells Adam Hill how to make cities loveable…
  • TRL answer key questions on urban traffic control
    March 21, 2014
    PC-based urban traffic control (UTC) continues to grow. Gavin Jackman, Head of Traffic and Software at TRL, looks forward. 1. PC-based urban traffic control is now very well established throughout the world. What have been the most significant developments or new features that have become available over the last two years? That’s a really interesting question because, from a software perspective, a few things are noticeable. Firstly, there are more players on the market – TRL’s Transyt Online, Imtech’s Imf
  • Panasonic in Colorado: Rocky mountain way
    December 3, 2018
    Panasonic is at the heart of a C-V2X project which began last year in Colorado. The company’s smart mobility boss Chris Armstrong tells Adam Hill how it is working out Colorado needs traffic and transport solutions – and fast. The US state’s population has grown 50% in the last 20 years and another 50% hike is predicted in the next 20. It also spends more than $13 billion in roadway crash costs each year. In 2015, 546 people died in traffic-related crashes, and more than 3,000 were seriously injured.