Skip to main content

Einride hires ‘remote’ driver for EV pods

A driver is to be hired in March by Swedish technology firm Einride – but he or she will not be required to sit behind a wheel.
By Adam Hill February 28, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Einride driverless pods will be used in a transport programme for Coca-Cola in Sweden

Instead, they will be responsible for the remote-control driving of Einride’s electric driverless transportation pods – thereby creating “a new category of jobs”.

The company says the ‘remote’ driver will push its partnership with Coca-Cola – in which it will operate a driverless transport pilot in the Stockholm area for the drinks giant – one step closer to fruition.

Commercial activity is expected to begin in the third quarter of the year. The driver – a former truck driver – will be expected to work closely with Einride’s technology team to provide feedback and “help shape the working environment of tomorrow’s truckers”.

The idea is that drivers will be able to monitor multiple vehicles and remotely control them – perhaps up to 10 at a time - in tricky traffic conditions. 

The firm says: “The next steps will involve the transitioning of additional on-road truck drivers to remote autonomous truck operators.”

It believes that, with the more widespread implementation of SAE level 4 self-driving technology, “trucking will change fundamentally”. 

“Today, our autonomous pods are operated by developers – robot engineers trained to drive trucks,” said Robert Falck, founder, and CEO of Einride. 

“A commercially scalable solution must rely on truck drivers, trained to remote-operate robots. The ins-and-outs of that future is what we’re investigating now, by involving truck drivers in the process.” 

Einride suggests that there is an existing shortfall in truck drivers, and that growing the autonomous truck sector therefore makes sense – both economically and in terms of emissions. 

The company says that driverless trucks will reduce CO2 emissions by 90% as well as lowering fuel, transport and operating costs.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The downside of driverless vehicles
    October 27, 2016
    Driverless cars will have a detrimental effect on congestion and security while the road safety benefits can be achieved sooner and cheaper using ADAS, argues Colin Sowman. Many Governments are consulting about the introduction of driverless vehicles and even running trials. As 70% or 80% of crashes are caused by human error, the promise of a crash-free future of driverless, self-driving or autonomous vehicles (call them what you will) is alluring, as are the claims of reduced congestion and lower emissions
  • Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    December 3, 2018
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
  • Majority of Brits do not think AVs will reduce accidents, says Axa
    December 3, 2018
    Three-quarters of UK residents do not believe driverless cars will improve road safety, even though 90% of accidents are caused by human error. In a survey of 2,000 respondents, insurance firm Axa says only a third of UK residents believe driverless cars would be better for the environment and only 25% think the technology will improve safety for pedestrians. Axa emphasises that motorists are confused by the definition of a driverless car as well as by what sort of autonomous technology is available in mo
  • Need for simpler urban tolling solutions
    January 10, 2013
    A common assumption, even amongst informed observers, is that there’s but a handful of urban charging schemes in operation around the world and scant prospect of that changing any time soon. Larger city-sized schemes such as Singapore, London and Stockholm come readily to mind but if we take a wider view and also consider urban access control and Low Emission Zones (LEZs) then the picture changes rather radically. There is a notable concentration of such schemes in Europe but worldwide the number is comfort