Skip to main content

Cohda: using different CV technologies would be ‘missed opportunity’

C-V2X versus DSRC is an issue that regulators - not the market - should decide
By Adam Hill May 26, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
It's conceivable that CVs on different continents will be using different communications technology (© Zlikovec | Dreamstime.com)

Debate over the wireless standards which will be vital for the safe deployment of connected vehicles (CVs) risks creating a 'missed opportunity', says one leading player in the Vehicle to Everything (V2X) sector.

Competing V2X technologies DSRC and cellular V2X (C-V2X) are vying for supremacy in the world's automotive markets.

In a wide-ranging interview with ITS International, Professor Paul Alexander, Cohda Wireless chief technical officer, said: "The challenges are there around the wireless standard for sure. Cohda is agnostic to either of those technologies."

While not wishing to be drawn on how the C-V2X versus DSRC competition might end, Alexander said: "I think one thing that's fairly obvious is that China will be a C-V2X world. So that's fairly plain. What's also true is that we have millions of VWs going out of the production line with DSRC ITS-G5 on them."

This creates a potential split across continents, he says. "What will be a pity to see will be some vehicles talking C-V2X and some vehicles that are talking ITS-G5 DSRC. And they won’t be able to see each other. That's just a missed opportunity."

He believes it will be possible to reconcile this to some extent - especially when it comes to safety.

"The first point is making sure they don't hurt each other," Alexander insists. "So at the very least, it needs to be that both systems can be effective in the presence of each other, even though they're isolated from each other - and I think that can be sorted out."

Ultimately he thinks that the market should not be the final arbiter.

"People talk about market forces sorting this out but I really think it's the regulators," he concludes.

"Regulators would like to say they don't want to specify technologies, but I do believe in this case it may be dangerous not to."
 

The full interview will be published in the July-August issue of ITS International

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Communication: the future of machine vision
    May 30, 2013
    Jason Barnes asks leading machine vision industry figures what they consider to be the educational barriers to the technology’s increased uptake by the ITS sector. The recent rush by some organisations within the ITS sector to associate themselves with the term ‘machine vision’ underlines just how important the technology has become in a relatively short space of time. However, despite the technology having been applied in certain traffic management applications for some years, there remains a significant s
  • 5G powers Peachtree connected shuttles 
    October 13, 2021
    Beep AVs equipped with 5G gateway to provide telematics data and talk to infrastructure
  • Kapsch: congestion zones need public support
    April 26, 2021
    Vital to get citizens on board, says John Horner of Kapsch TrafficCom North America
  • Smart Cities put people, prudence and businesses before technology
    December 4, 2014
    Caroline Haynes tells ITS International that transport planners and equipment suppliers need to adopt different thinking and the smartest cities don’t call themselves smart. The term Smart Cities has been around for some time and has become something of a catch-all term applied to novel or futuristic technology deployed in an urban setting.