Skip to main content

California approves AV passenger framework

Two programmes allow companies to test AVs with or without a driver on board
By Ben Spencer December 4, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
California dreaming... (© Syda Productions | Dreamstime.com)

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has approved two autonomous vehicle (AV) programmes that companies can take part in to provide fare-based transportation services.

One will allow companies to test AVs with a driver on board while the other will enable participants to operate AV services with remote operators instead. 

Companies must hold either a Charter-Party Carrier Class P permit or a Class A charter party certificate in the drivered programme issued by the CPUC.

They must also have a California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) AV Deployment Permit to take part in both programmes.

Companies are also required to submit data including quarterly reports to the CPUC, with aggregated and anonymised information about the pick-up and drop-off locations for individual trips, the availability and volume of wheelchair-accessible rides and the service levels to disadvantaged communities.

Permit holders must also establish a passenger safety plan that outlines policies and procedures to minimise risk for all passengers, including those with limited mobility, vision impairments and other disabilities.

Commissioner Genevieve Shiroma called it an "important milestone" for the CPUC’s regulation of transportation in California.

She said the authorisation "protects passenger safety, expands autonomous vehicle availability to all of Californians - including disadvantaged and low-income communities - and works to reduce greenhouse gases".

“This decision also takes important steps to support our study of how autonomous vehicle fleets can be leveraged to support the grid as a demand side management resource, dovetailing on our efforts to incorporate transportation into the electric sector,” Shiroma added.

Companies must set up a Covid-19 emergency plan following guidance on preventing the transmission of the virus. 
 

Related Content

  • January 27, 2012
    Rapid growth of bus rapid transit schemes on US Pacific coast
    This section pulls together all the multi-modal topics in each issue. Subject matter will include smartcards; ticketing and payment systems; passenger information systems; fleet management for buses, trains and light rail; park and ride systems; on-line access to real-time information via Internet portals
  • May 11, 2020
    AVs and poor weather – a bad mix
    The US DoT has produced a report on how adverse weather and road conditions will affect automated vehicles – it found inconsistency between different cars with these features which are already on highways and suggests limitations are not yet understood
  • June 20, 2016
    Do buses need subsidies in congestion charging areas
    David Crawford takes a look at the debate surrounding bus subsidies. Subsidies for public transport are a well-known and frequently-used policy tool directed at reducing the high environmental and social costs of peak-period traffic congestion. But at the end of last year the Swedish Centre for Transport Studies published a working paper entitled ‘Should buses still be subsidised in Stockholm?’ This concluded that the subsidy levels currently being applied in Stockholm could be nearly halved by setting bus
  • January 30, 2012
    IntelliDrive, connectivity, safety, mobility and the environment?
    Shelley Row, Director of the ITS Joint Program Office, US Department of Transportation, details the new five-year ITS Strategic Research Plan. Imagine a world where vehicles of all types can talk to each other in order to reduce or eliminate crashes, where vehicles can talk to traffic signals to eliminate unnecessary stops, where travellers can get accurate travel time information about all modes and route options, and where transportation managers have data which allows them to accurately assess multimodal