Skip to main content

California approves AV passenger framework

Two programmes allow companies to test AVs with or without a driver on board
By Ben Spencer December 4, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
California dreaming... (© Syda Productions | Dreamstime.com)

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has approved two autonomous vehicle (AV) programmes that companies can take part in to provide fare-based transportation services.

One will allow companies to test AVs with a driver on board while the other will enable participants to operate AV services with remote operators instead. 

Companies must hold either a Charter-Party Carrier Class P permit or a Class A charter party certificate in the drivered programme issued by the CPUC.

They must also have a California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) AV Deployment Permit to take part in both programmes.

Companies are also required to submit data including quarterly reports to the CPUC, with aggregated and anonymised information about the pick-up and drop-off locations for individual trips, the availability and volume of wheelchair-accessible rides and the service levels to disadvantaged communities.

Permit holders must also establish a passenger safety plan that outlines policies and procedures to minimise risk for all passengers, including those with limited mobility, vision impairments and other disabilities.

Commissioner Genevieve Shiroma called it an "important milestone" for the CPUC’s regulation of transportation in California.

She said the authorisation "protects passenger safety, expands autonomous vehicle availability to all of Californians - including disadvantaged and low-income communities - and works to reduce greenhouse gases".

“This decision also takes important steps to support our study of how autonomous vehicle fleets can be leveraged to support the grid as a demand side management resource, dovetailing on our efforts to incorporate transportation into the electric sector,” Shiroma added.

Companies must set up a Covid-19 emergency plan following guidance on preventing the transmission of the virus. 
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Will interoperability prevent progress?
    January 10, 2014
    David Crawford examines the political and industrial background to the tolling technology debate. Saving the US State of California ‘millions of dollars’ in tolling infrastructure costs by encouraging new technologies is the professed aim of a legislative Bill, SB 242, which is currently moving through the State’s Senate (upper house) process. According to its sponsor, Republican State Senator Mark Wyland, permitting alternatives to the current FasTrak-branded radio-frequency identification (RFID)-based sys
  • MaaS will be adopted quicker in Europe than in the US: here’s why
    December 5, 2018
    A new report suggests that MaaS will be implemented more quickly in Europe than in the US – but why should this be? Ben Spencer examines the arguments
  • How can US transportation be ‘re-envisioned’?
    October 17, 2019
    In her address to this year’s ITS America Annual Meeting, congresswoman Eleanor Holmes Norton, chair of the House Subcommittee on Highways and Transit, called for a ‘re-envisioning’ of transportation. Her speech is below – and ITS International asks a number of US experts what they would like to see ‘re-envisioned’…

    I would like to welcome  ITS America to the nation’s capital.

  • SkedGo adds Covid alert to MaaS app
    May 12, 2020
    SkedGo’s feature assesses crowd levels to see which routes have fewer people