Skip to main content

AVs could make driving ‘more dangerous’: report

Automated vehicles (AVs) could make driving more dangerous – that is the stark suggestion from a new report by the International Transport Forum (ITF). The report - Safer Roads with Automated Vehicles? – casts doubt on claims that 90% of road deaths could be avoided because the introduction of AVs would eliminate human error. ITF says such claims are at best “untested”.
May 23, 2018 Read time: 2 mins
Automated vehicles (AVs) could make driving more dangerous – that is the stark suggestion from a %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external new report false https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/safer-roads-automated-vehicles.pdf false false%> by the 998 International Transport Forum (ITF). The report - Safer Roads with Automated Vehicles? – casts doubt on claims that 90% of road deaths could be avoided because the introduction of AVs would eliminate human error. ITF says such claims are at best “untested”.


“Shared responsibility between robot and human drivers can in fact lead to more complex driving decisions,” the report goes on. “The unintended consequences might make driving less safe, not more. In situations where humans take over control from robots, more crashes might occur among ‘average’ drivers who normally do not take risks.”

This is particularly likely in circumstances where drivers must take over from automated driving in emergency situations, ITF says.

While full automation could therefore reduce the number of severe crashes “significantly”, the problem with partially automated systems is that “humans retain an advantage in many contexts”. Overcoming this gap requires multiple sensors and connectivity with infrastructure – but cybersecurity risks means that “the avoidance of crashes should never depend on access to shared external communication channels alone”.

ITF recommends designing AVs so that safety-critical systems are “functionally independent and cannot fail in case of connectivity issues”.

The report comes as preliminary 2017 figures suggest a slight decrease in the number of road deaths. In 2017, only five out of 29 countries of the International Road Traffic Data and Analysis Group registered increases of 2% or more in the number of road deaths compared to 2016. Traffic fatalities fell year on year in 20 countries.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Safence Super C slope fence makes the MASH grade
    March 21, 2018
    The Safence Super C-profile wire rope slope fence from Blue Systems is now MASH accredited. The Super C is used on slopes and side areas of roads, as well as medians and is available in a range of systems in accordance with NCHRP 350, European EN 1317, similar to Blue Systems Safence U-profile cable fence. Now the Super C is US MASH accredited, making it the world’s first MASHG slope and side cable barrier to carry the assurance, claims Mats Heinevik, chief executive of Blue Systems.
  • Interoperability essential to take advantage of C-ITS, says EU-funded review
    June 21, 2016
    According to a new report (link http://www.transport-research.info/c-its) from the European Commission-funded Transport Research & Innovation Portal (TRIP), there remains a significant body of work to be done and to address different approaches amongst stakeholders on certain aspects of Cooperative Intelligent Transport Systems (C-ITS). The latest research report has drawn its findings from the analysis of over a decade’s worth of C-IT
  • Trust is the key, says Cubic’s Crissy Ditmore
    August 7, 2019
    Trust is the key to encouraging people to take up shared mobility and MaaS services, thinks Cubic Transportation Systems’ Crissy Ditmore. She tells Adam Hill why sharing must be the way forward Crissy Ditmore is on the move. Director of strategy at Cubic Transportation Systems since September last year, she lives in Boise, Idaho, but doesn’t see a great deal of the city as she is “90% of the time on the road”. This is appropriate for someone whose business is working out how to get people from place to p
  • UK organisations disagree on smart motorway ‘dangers’
    September 13, 2019
    A spat over how dangerous the UK’s all lane running (ALR) or ‘smart’ motorways are has broken out between Highways England and a leading motoring organisation. Smart motorways do not have hard shoulders, instead relying on emergency areas at intervals to provide refuge for stranded motorists. The AA recently highlighted Stationary Vehicle Detection, a Highways England report published in March 2016, which looks at how long it takes to identify a vehicle broken down in a live lane of smart motorway when s