Skip to main content

AVs could make driving ‘more dangerous’: report

Automated vehicles (AVs) could make driving more dangerous – that is the stark suggestion from a new report by the International Transport Forum (ITF). The report - Safer Roads with Automated Vehicles? – casts doubt on claims that 90% of road deaths could be avoided because the introduction of AVs would eliminate human error. ITF says such claims are at best “untested”.
May 23, 2018 Read time: 2 mins
Automated vehicles (AVs) could make driving more dangerous – that is the stark suggestion from a %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external new report false https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/safer-roads-automated-vehicles.pdf false false%> by the 998 International Transport Forum (ITF). The report - Safer Roads with Automated Vehicles? – casts doubt on claims that 90% of road deaths could be avoided because the introduction of AVs would eliminate human error. ITF says such claims are at best “untested”.


“Shared responsibility between robot and human drivers can in fact lead to more complex driving decisions,” the report goes on. “The unintended consequences might make driving less safe, not more. In situations where humans take over control from robots, more crashes might occur among ‘average’ drivers who normally do not take risks.”

This is particularly likely in circumstances where drivers must take over from automated driving in emergency situations, ITF says.

While full automation could therefore reduce the number of severe crashes “significantly”, the problem with partially automated systems is that “humans retain an advantage in many contexts”. Overcoming this gap requires multiple sensors and connectivity with infrastructure – but cybersecurity risks means that “the avoidance of crashes should never depend on access to shared external communication channels alone”.

ITF recommends designing AVs so that safety-critical systems are “functionally independent and cannot fail in case of connectivity issues”.

The report comes as preliminary 2017 figures suggest a slight decrease in the number of road deaths. In 2017, only five out of 29 countries of the International Road Traffic Data and Analysis Group registered increases of 2% or more in the number of road deaths compared to 2016. Traffic fatalities fell year on year in 20 countries.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Falling asleep in an AV… but what happens next?
    September 18, 2019
    Sleeping while a driverless car speeds you to your destination has long been touted as the dream of the new technology – and something of a nightmare for safety campaigners. A new video from the BBC shows exactly what happens if a driver falls asleep in an autonomous vehicle (AV). In the filmed test, the AV prompts the driver to resume control when approaching roadworks on a motorway. When the driver fails to act, the vehicle comes to a halt and automatically parks in a lay-by. Motor industry research
  • Waymo gets California green light for public driverless tests
    November 2, 2018
    Waymo has been granted a licence to test fully-driverless cars on public roads in California. It is the first company to be given the green light for such trials in the state – and it means there will be no test driver sitting in the driver’s seat. The permit includes day and night testing on city streets, rural roads and highways with speed limits of up to 65mph. Waymo insists: “Our vehicles can safely handle fog and light rain, and testing in those conditions is included in our permit. We will gradual
  • UK reviews MaaS, data and micromobility regulation
    March 27, 2019
    Mobility as a Service (MaaS), transport data and micromobility are to be the subject of new regulatory review by the UK government. Zero-emission vehicles, driverless vehicles (AVs) and drones are already under similar review. But in a document, Future of Mobility: Urban Strategy, maps out how the country’s Department of Transport will approach other mobility opportunities – and challenges. “This is the moment to reflect on what we as a society want these changes to deliver and what we want our urban
  • CILT urges policy review for London Mayor’s transport strategy
    October 4, 2017
    The Mayor of London’s Draft Transport Strategy (DMTS) lacks realism and risks unintended consequences, according to a report from the Charted Institute of Logistics and Transport (CILT). Proposals on bus priority require a fundamental review as speeds on a third of London’s bus routes have fallen more than 5% in the past year, including a reallocation of road space, construction works (with resulting congestion) and an increase in the volume of private hire and van traffic. CILT calls for bus corridors