Skip to main content

5G-Routes seeks cross-border connections

European CAM initiative test cases include VRU alerts and truck platooning in Latvia
By Adam Hill May 31, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
'The biggest challenge in testing innovations over the 5G network in a cross-border setting is finding a safe environment' (image courtesy of 5G-Routes)

The first use-case demonstrations, as part of the European Union-funded 5G-Routes project, have been held at the 5G cross-border mobility testbed at the Bikernieki race track in Riga, Latvia.

5G-Routes is a consortium made up of 21 partners from nine European countries, whose role is to develop innovative and commercially exploitable connected and automated mobility (CAM) use cases and ensure cross-border automated mobility among a number of network operators.

The testbed has been developed by the Latvian mobile firm LMT, in collaboration with Estonia's Telia. 

The main challenge of CAM across borders is ensuring seamless connectivity - something which has been addressed by EU projects such as 5G-Mobix, which focuses on developing 5G use cases in transportation.

“The biggest challenge in testing innovations over the 5G network in a cross-border setting is finding a safe environment that enables undisturbed testing in realistic conditions," said Artūrs Lindenbergs, mobility innovation lead at LMT. 

"Thus, a closed and safe cross-border testing space significantly alleviates this hurdle, facilitating testing on a wider scale and massively accelerating the development of innovative cross-border solutions in all industries, including smart mobility,”

Four cross-border use cases were demonstrated, including the Latvian Institute of Electronics and Computer Science's showcase of dynamic vehicles platooning.

The Vedecom Institute for the Energy Transition and Tallinn University of Technology (TTU) tested two interconnected use cases – a vulnerable road user (VRU) collision avoidance and connected maintenance.

In the demo, a pedestrian received alerts from a connected electric vehicle that had detected faults via sensors, warning the pedestrian of a potential collision and providing crucial seconds to remove themselves from danger.

The VRU and the electric vehicle were each connected to a different mobile operator, testing the cross-border connectivity.  

There are now plans to test use cases in the Valka-Valga trial site, located on the Latvian-Estonian border, and the Finnish-Estonian cross border trial site, situated between the Vuosaari and Muuga harbors.

5G-Routes has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.

Related Content

  • C-ITS in Europe: From vision to reality
    September 18, 2024
    While improved safety is the main aim of Europe’s emerging C-ITS network, it is not the only one. Lessons are being learned and functionality is expanding. Andrew Stone reports on progress…
  • Syracuse models post-industrial revival for US cities
    August 13, 2015
    A connective corridor in Syracuse, New York State, could be a model for other post-industrial cities, as David Crawford discovers. The aim of the city of Syracuse’ 5.6km-long Connective Corridor in Onandaga County in upstate New York is to create a model ‘complete street’ for use in wider regeneration schemes. Key transport-sector components are traffic calming, high-quality transit with accessible passenger information, plus walkability and bike-friendliness.
  • Uber clean-up - those all-important facts and figures
    September 11, 2020
    Ride-hailing giant says it can switch to all-electric vehicles 'in any major city' by 2030
  • Drunk driver can sue power company for accident
    August 16, 2013
    The Washington State Supreme Court has ruled that a drunk driver and her passenger can sue the county and a utility company for a 2005 car crash, overturning a lower court's decision in a case involving a 2005 crash. The Supreme Court ruled that government entities have a duty to ensure roads are reasonably safe for public travel, even if the driver is at fault. The controversial decision means cities, counties and utility companies can be held liable when faulty road designs lead to injuries in car crashes