Skip to main content

US Wi-Fi Innovation Act could hamper V2V

The US government is looking into opening up wi-fi space for the public, but it could impact on vehicle-to-vehicle communication (V2V) technology developed to prevent up to 80 per cent of car crashes, according to a discussion on CBS News. After more than a decade in development and more than a half-billion dollars in taxpayer money spent, the technology aimed at making roads safer and saving an estimated 1,083 lives every year may now be sidelined to make room for wi-fi. Dr Peter Sweatman, director
March 27, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
The US government is looking into opening up wi-fi space for the public, but it could impact on vehicle-to-vehicle communication (V2V) technology developed to prevent up to 80 per cent of car crashes, according to a discussion on CBS News.

After more than a decade in development and more than a half-billion dollars in taxpayer money spent, the technology aimed at making roads safer and saving an estimated 1,083 lives every year may now be sidelined to make room for wi-fi.

Dr Peter Sweatman, director of the 5647 University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute (UMTRI) and chair of 560 ITS America’s Leadership Circle, took part in the discussion on (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communication, together with 834 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) administrator Mark Rosekind and US Senator Cory Booker.

The discussion focused on the Wi-Fi Innovation Act, introduced by Senators Booker and Marco Rubio to open up the radio frequency reserved for V2V. Government estimates say wi-fi contributes to more than US$140 billion of economic activity per year and demand is growing for the limited available spectrum.

The bill has bipartisan supporters in Congress and would require the FCC to evaluate whether wi-fi and V2V can co-exist.

"We want to get to the point where traffic moves like two schools of fish seamlessly moving together," Dr Peter Sweatman said.

He has been working on the technology for five years and is now asking Congress not to pass the bill, fearing it would mark open season on V2V's bandwidth.

"Our concern is that any other traffic within that spectrum could potentially block one of these important signals," Sweatman said. "We don't want to be in a position where some other use of the spectrum for transmitting a movie or something, is going to have to be stopped so that our signal can get through."

His pilot project at the University of Michigan is set to expand to 20,000 vehicles next year. He says any changes could delay the safety equipment's roll-out by as long as five more years.

"Spectrum sharing could put the frequencies at risk of dangerous interference," warned the NTSB. "The opportunity to improve transportation safety must not be delayed by issues associated with interference."

NTSB administrator Mark Rosekind said the issue is not about convenience or access to the web, but about saving lives. He doesn't necessarily oppose spectrum sharing, but said it was the FCC who set aside the bandwidth 15 years ago.

The auto industry itself has invested half a billion dollars in V2Vbut the government is said to be frustrated with the pace at which the technology has developed, and say the auto industry has been slow to embrace the idea of sharing bandwidth.  They have some big supporters: two FCC commissioners are open to sharing, and so is corporate giant Comcast.

Related Content

  • C-ITS in the EU: ‘A little tribal’
    April 1, 2019
    As the C-ITS Delegated Act begins its journey through the European policy maze, Adam Hill looks at who is expecting what from this proposed framework for connected vehicles – and why some people are insisting that the lawmakers are already getting things wrong here are furrowed brows in Brussels and Strasbourg as European Union legislators begin to consider the rules which will underpin future services such as connected vehicles. The idea is to create a regulatory framework to harmonise cooperative ITS
  • Priority for safety and interoperability, need for DSRC
    July 18, 2012
    Justin McNew, Chief Technology Officer, Kapsch TrafficCom Inc., USA offers his opinion of where 5.9GHz DSRC technology will head in the coming years. The debate ranges back and forth over the most suitable technological solution for future tolling and charging in the US. However, the coming trend is common cooperative infrastructure: instrumented roads and vehicles with the capacity to communicate with each other over all manner of safety, mobility and traveller applications, many of which will involve fina
  • Debating the future development of ANPR
    July 31, 2012
    What future is there for automatic number plate recognition? Will it be supplanted by electronic vehicle identification, or will continuing development maintain the technology's relevance? In recent years, digitisation and IP-based communication networks have allowed Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) to achieve ever-greater utility and a commensurate increase in deployments. But where does the technology go next - indeed, does it have a future in the face of the increasing use of, for instance, Dedi
  • US transportation funding breakthrough by the end of this week?
    June 28, 2012
    US Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman John L. Mica (R-FL) announced yesterday that House and Senate conferees are concluding a bicameral, bipartisan agreement on a major transportation bill. The measure focuses on unprecedented reforms by cutting red tape and consolidating federal transportation programmes.