Antaira Technologies’ marketing engineer Brian Roth explains why the increasing capacity of wireless bridges is reducing the cost of expanding and upgrading ITS networks.      
     
With more than half of the world’s population now living in cities, the need for efficient transportation of both people and goods has never been greater and that pressure is unlikely to ease any time soon. Indeed in many regions of the world the rate of urbanisation is still increasing as the demand for rural workers continues to decline. However, updating the infrastructure for the technological and other needs of these modern populations is a major challenge and none more so than the transportation sector. Consistent upgrades have been necessary as cities have grown and intelligent transportation systems (ITS) are increasingly necessary to optimise the capacity of the existing infrastructure – be that road, light rail or even pedestrians. 
     
Individually the ITS installations achieve their local goals but greater gains can be achieved by linking installations together to enable systems to cover wider areas. The comprehensive interconnection of different parts of the system, such as sensors, traffic controllers, variable message signs (VMS) and cameras, improves the efficiency of the staff at the traffic management centre (TMC).  In an entirely new piece of infrastructure this can be done using hard-wired or optical cables, but getting this type of connectivity with existing systems – particularly in older cities – can be problematic. What is becoming more common is installing a scalable Ethernet network infrastructure.
     
Just like a well working reliable car requires periodic services and upgrades, the transportation infrastructure benefits from maintenance and upgrades.  A scalable ITS Ethernet network creates a more efficient TMC. When a city wants to expand and extend its ITS network one of the greatest hurdles to overcome is the city itself. In older cities this will often require construction work to install or expand upon the existing Ethernet or fibre optic communication network. Not only is this time-consuming and expensive, it can also create delays for traffic during the construction phase.   
Wireless technology conforming to IEEE 802.11 is one of the most   efficient ways of overcoming the previously stated challenges and offers   flexible solutions to upgrading a city’s infrastructure in place of   hard-wiring. Indeed, an IEEE 802.11 wireless radio can be used to link a   smaller, new, network of devices to the main network through a single   wireless connection. 
     
Continued   advancements made to the IEEE 802.11 wireless communication standard,   include the introduction of IEEE 802.11n for increased throughput and   longer communication distances with unique and uncrowded frequencies.   And while the number of devices on these particular frequencies   increase, wireless security has also been greatly enhanced with the   introduction of IEEE 802.11i and 802.1x which use WPA2 authentication.   
While  802.11 wireless communications can be utilised in many situations, the  installer has to be aware of the environment in which the equipment will  be deployed to prevent unexpected circumstances.  For optimum  performance there should be a clear line of sight between both of the  end units then, in ideal circumstances, the theoretical range is up to  3.2km (2 miles). Objects such as thick steel buildings, rock formations  and trees will reduce the efficiency of the transmissions. The  transmission rate will change depending on distance, interference and  how much information is being sent and the number of devices connected.  There can also be problems with electromagnetic interference such as  power substations or high-power lines which will also reduce the overall  performance of the IEEE 802.11 wireless. In both cases integral data  error checks ensure that the data is complete and has not become  corrupt.
     
The 802.11  wireless standards offer a range of configuration options such as access  point, client, bridge and repeater mode allowing for versatility.  For  example, from a security standpoint, an 802.11 wireless bridge will  create a more secure point-to-point link between two units than a  typical access point/client application where anyone can attempt to  connect and log in if they have the correct password. In a bridge  application the only allowable wireless connection is between the paired  units and other wireless devices cannot log on. Think of it as being  more akin to an invisible wire rather than a wireless signal that  prevents unintended users from accessing the network. 
Another  aspect of the twinned bridging units’ security is that they   only accept  wireless connections from one direction. So in instances   where multiple  802.11 wireless devices from different directions need   to be conveyed  to/from the TMC, a normal access point can be used to   gather the various  data streams into a single communication which can   then be transmitted  over the wireless bridge. 
     
If    line of sight is not possible or if the run becomes too long,   repeaters  can be used to extend the range and/or get around obstacles   although  this is not without losses. While there is 100% communication   between  the first two units, each subsequent repeater will have the   bandwidth –  so between units two to three the bandwidth is halved and   that is halved  again between units three and four. 
      
Wireless technology can also reduce the cost of installing or expanding emergency vehicle prioritisation systems (EVP) which turns traffic lights green in front of ambulances or other emergency vehicles. This can cut up to 30 seconds off the time taken to get through each signalised intersection and reduce the number of accidents between motorists and emergency response vehicles (see page 64). While such results may be desirable, if the intersection has not been networked it cannot be EVP enabled because the signal needs to receive a command from either the emergency vehicle dispatcher or the TMC.
There are a couple of reasons why a traffic intersection may not be networked, the first of which is a physical restriction, such as a bridge, that would be challenging and costly to cut and install network cables. Another is that the distance between traffic signals can easily exceed Ethernet’s 100m capability and optical fibre cabling has to be installed underground, making it expensive. In such instances an IEEE 802.11 wireless bridge can be used to link the network from an EVP capable intersection to one without a network connection (although the EVP equipment will also have to be installed on the intersection lights.
 Another instance  might  be a light rail system  where the depot has a pre-existing  network  infrastructure such as  serial, Ethernet or fibre. In order to  install  CCTV surveillance  cameras along the route and on the platforms  new  cameras will need to  be installed and connected to the network. If   traditional wiring is  used there will be at least two limitations to   traditional wiring: the  inherent distance limitation of Ethernet cable   (100m) and obstacles  for the cable being run to the cameras. 
     
Inevitably    the cable will need to be hidden from the public, located either in   the  floor or walls, which will require cutting or drilling. In such    instances a wireless installation can bring the CCTV signal back to the    TMC without having to shut down the platform to install the cable and    while it is not included in the 802.11 standard, many devices are now    moving to power over Ethernet (PoE) meaning that there may be no need  to   even run a power cable to these devices. Until now installers have  had   to individually configure each pair of IEEE 802.11 wireless  devices   following installation. To speed this process some wireless  units, such   as 
     
For    any IEEE 802.11 wireless network to function correctly it is  essential   to select the correct radios with appropriate antennas and  ensure the   correct cables are used between the radios and antennas.  The mounting   requirements for all the components must also be  verified.  Wireless   radios typically require the user to configure the  device and implement   any additional features that might be required,  although some, such as   Antaira’s APX-120N5, come as a preconfigured  bridge. In these, settings   such as the IP address, SSID and WPA2  security have already been set  up  so the user only needs to connect  power to the devices and the units   will automatically link up ready to  pass data. There are management   capabilities if users need to adjust  some of the settings.  
     
The    APX-120N5 uses PoE to power the device and is capable of being  powered   from either 24v PoE or the standard 48v PoE.However that does  not  extend  to powering the CCTV cameras or other devices connected to  it  for  image/data transmission purposes.  
     
With    an 800mW radio the wireless bridge is able to support long range high    speed communication at up to 150Mbps. The 5GHz 19dBi  dual-polarisation   antenna is built-in to the sealed (IP67) units which  can operate in the   temperature range of -20°C to 70°C.  Optional  security features  include  hidden SSID, MAC address filtering, WEP  (Wired Equivalent  Privacy) in  64- and 128-bit as well as IEEE 802.11i  and 802.1x security   authentication. 
     
So with the advent of the wireless bridge, projects previously considered too difficult or too costly may now be viable.
    
        
        



