Skip to main content

Making connections without compromising security

We listen in as global experts discuss connected vehicles and cybersecurity. By 2019 there will be almost 44 million connected cars globally and by 2022 that figure will be nearer 70 million; some 40% will be electric powered, according to market analyst Frost & Sullivan. But its report said the issue of end-to-end security for the new technology is still under debate, as vehicle OEMs engage with vendors to test specific security application areas for both over-the-air and vehicle-to-exterior services.
November 10, 2017 Read time: 4 mins
It is not only new vehicles like the ones rolling off Fiat Chrysler’s assembly line that will be connected.
We listen in as global experts discuss connected vehicles and cybersecurity.


By 2019 there will be almost 44 million connected cars globally and by 2022 that figure will be nearer 70 million; some 40% will be electric powered, according to market analyst 2097 Frost & Sullivan. But its report said the issue of end-to-end security for the new technology is still under debate, as vehicle OEMs engage with vendors to test specific security application areas for both over-the-air and vehicle-to-exterior services.

Traditionally, the car has been a secure, closed environment. But connected vehicles (CVs) are potentially open, and thus of interest to the maliciously-minded, with more than 50 points of vulnerability that can be used to threaten people’s lives and automakers’ reputation.  

A webinar hosted by Frost and Sullivan’s head of digital transformation, Jean-Noël Georges, discussed the current state of play with Christine Caviglioli (vice-president of automotive of digital security specialist M2M Gemalto) and Yvan Gravier, CEO of French CV open data startup Eliocity.  

Cybersecurity management and the building up of consumer confidence will be the two decisive factors for the continued growth of the CV sector, warned Georges. He cited Fiat Chrysler’s voluntary safety recall of some 1.4 million cars and trucks equipped with radios that enable remote updating of the in-vehicle software.

The recall, to check the vehicles’ security against possible imitation attacks by hackers, followed the high-profile cyberjacking of a Cherokee Jeep. Those responsible were able to remotely manipulate some of the vehicle’s critical functions, including transmission, steering and brakes. At that time Fiat Chrysler stated that, to its knowledge, there had not been a real-world incident of remote hacking into any of its vehicles and that the recall had found no defects.

“But,” stressed Georges, “it is now becoming obligatory for auto-industry OEMs to actively pursue cybersecurity measures rather than simply trying to mitigate the risks.” These can include breaking into cloud infrastructures, ‘sniffing’ data from communications networks and intruding into a vehicle’s engine control unit or infotainment system.

“Once these risks are being better planned for, however”, he continued, “the CV revolution will prove to be a fantastic opportunity for the traditional players to reinvent the way in which consumers interact with automakers and their vehicles.” He pointed to the likes of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, which are already making themselves felt in the connected car market; with Apple nurturing plans to mimic its software role inside the vehicle. “These are providing opportunities for the automotive industry to reinvent itself; but the levels of encryption will be critical.”

Caviglioli highlighted the importance of building a ‘chain of trust’. This has to run from the initial design and the vehicle’s manufacture, to its sale through a dealership and continued via periodic diagnostics and maintenance (while accommodating changes of ownership) to final scrapping. “Security will need to be both by default and design, with the emphasis on protecting what matters, where it matters and when it matters,” she continued, emphasising the need for the protection of the contained data in a car along the way.

The ownership issue, stressed Gravier, will become all the more relevant in an era when people will no longer be using individually-owned cars as all-purpose vehicles, but looking for the optimal mobility solution for each specific need – including the sharing of connected cars. These, he said, will include upgraded, existing vehicles as well as new ones coming fully equipped off the production lines. Aftermarket installation for connectivity will need to be carried out by reliable companies.

There will also need to be clear protocols for the sharing of, and creating value from, the data generated by and collected from connected cars while out on the roads, with implications for its long-term management and security.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • SwRI investigates cybersecurity weaknesses in transportation management systems
    November 6, 2017
    Southwest Research Institute (SwRI), in San Antonio, has been awarded a $750,000 (£573,000) contract from the Transportation Research Board to help state and local agencies address cyber-attack risks on current transportation systems and those posed by future connected vehicles. Cyber security firm, Praetorian will support SwRI by conducting a security audit of traffic management systems and develop a web-based guide to help transportation agencies learn how to safeguard equipment.
  • 5G or not 5G?
    April 16, 2019
    Just a few years ago, there was only one solution in terms of communications protocols for delivering vehicle connectivity. Now, road operators and vehicle manufacturers face choices – including a moral choice, perhaps. Jason Barnes looks at the current state of play There is a debate raging in the ITS world over future communications protocols. Asfinag, Austria’s national strategic road operator, has announced it will from 2020 be using ITS-G5 to support cooperative ITS (C-ITS) applications (‘First thin
  • Study reveals major concerns over the security of connected cars
    March 2, 2016
    New research has revealed that half of British drivers (49 per cent) are concerned about the safety of the connected car, with automotive manufacturers also admitting there could be a security lag of up to three years before systems catch up with cyber threats. The report, commissioned by Veracode and carried out by the International Data Corporation (IDC), revealed half of drivers are concerned about the security of driver-aid applications, such as adaptive cruise control, self-parking, and collision av
  • Favourable legislation essential for developing successful test sites, finds Frost & Sullivan
    May 26, 2016
    New analysis from Frost & Sullivan, Global Test Sites and Incentive Programs for Automated Cars, finds unfavourable legislation in many parts of the world can delay the testing, validation and subsequent introduction of automated vehicle technologies by a few years. Despite the availability of advanced automated functional testing in several parts of the world, original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and automotive technology providers favour North American test beds to the ones in Europe and Asia, says