Skip to main content

Time to set standards for mapping noise and stick to them

Designer and provider of acoustics and air pollution simulation software for environmental modelling, SoundPlan, is calling on the bodies responsible for setting noise standards around the world to ensure that they implement and maintain high quality standards with thorough test procedures and scenarios. According to SoundPlan, the USA’s Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) is identified as an example of poor practice in this arena. When testing the standards SoundPlan software engi
February 25, 2016 Read time: 3 mins
Designer and provider of acoustics and air pollution simulation software for environmental modelling, SoundPlan, is calling on the bodies responsible for setting noise standards around the world to ensure that they implement and maintain high quality standards with thorough test procedures and scenarios.

According to SoundPlan, the USA’s 831 Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) is identified as an example of poor practice in this arena. When testing the standards SoundPlan software engineers found errors in the TNM source code that meant mapping software would produce incorrect results.

The TNM standards also only allow for noise movement over two dimensions, when in reality sound moves in 3D, for example, the noise at the top of a tower block is not the same as at its base, but it would be according to TNM.

The standard planned for introduction in Europe is also being questioned by SoundPlan. After more than a decade in development, Cnossos is due to become a common European regulation. The European Commission has agreed on the principle procedure and on a schedule of its implementation. However, SoundPlan expects that the equations and parameters will change when the test procedures are written and inconsistencies are discovered.

SoundPlan understands that countries outside of Europe are also looking at this standard, but advises that it would not be prudent to use it yet as the regulation is not firm and there are no procedures for quality assurance (test questions) in place.

SoundPlan believes there needs to be consistent and quality controlled standards to protect people from unnecessary harm across the globe. Noise reduction is important for environmental purposes, but also to ensure companies are meeting health and safety compliance rules and regulations.

However, SoundPlan already has over 70 standards implemented and some countries are re-interpreting the science behind noise calculations every couple of years and altering their requirements accordingly.

Arne Berndt, owner/adviser at SoundPlan and SoundPlan International, said: “Wherever possible we work with the organisations putting together standards to ensure they are of a consistently high level. We are also part of a group that tries to get all internationally relevant software producers to synchronise their procedures. However, it is important to remember that a standard is only as good as the quality assurance that comes with it. Many countries do not release test procedures and test scenarios that can be verified by an outside party. This means that people using mapping software find answers they don’t expect and the modelling cannot be effective.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • C-ITS in the EU: ‘A little tribal’
    April 1, 2019
    As the C-ITS Delegated Act begins its journey through the European policy maze, Adam Hill looks at who is expecting what from this proposed framework for connected vehicles – and why some people are insisting that the lawmakers are already getting things wrong here are furrowed brows in Brussels and Strasbourg as European Union legislators begin to consider the rules which will underpin future services such as connected vehicles. The idea is to create a regulatory framework to harmonise cooperative ITS
  • C-ITS in the EU: ‘A little tribal’
    April 1, 2019
    As the C-ITS Delegated Act begins its journey through the European policy maze, Adam Hill looks at who is expecting what from this proposed framework for connected vehicles – and why some people are insisting that the lawmakers are already getting things wrong here are furrowed brows in Brussels and Strasbourg as European Union legislators begin to consider the rules which will underpin future services such as connected vehicles. The idea is to create a regulatory framework to harmonise cooperative ITS
  • Increased automation is already improving road safety
    April 20, 2017
    Richard Cuerden considers how many of the technologies developed as part of a move toward autonomous vehicles are already being deployed as ADAS improve road safety. The drive to create autonomous vehicles has caused a re-evaluation of what is needed to safely navigate today’s roads and the development of systems that can replace the driver in many scenarios. However, many manufacturers are not waiting for ‘tomorrow’ and are already incorporating these systems in their new cars as Advanced Driver Assistanc
  • Preparing for connected vehicle technology challenge
    December 14, 2012
    A decision on mandating connected vehicle technology is expected in 2013, when associated political issues such as privacy are likely to come to the fore. Pete Goldin investigates industry’s preparations for the challenge. Once in a while new technology comes along with the power to revolutionise the way we live our lives. Connected vehicle technology could be such a game changer. If mandated in the United States, it could quickly become the status quo for transportation in the US, and such a disruptive cha