Skip to main content

StreetDrone urges more emphasis on C/AV hardware 

A greater reliance is needed on the contribution hardware can make towards safety within autonomous vehicles (AVs), according to a report by StreetDrone.
By David Arminas April 15, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
StreetDrone's report draws on experience of urban C/AV trials (© Akarat Phasura | Dreamstime.com)

The company, a maker of hardware and software, said the purpose of the Putting Safety First in Autonomous Vehicles report is to make an experience-based contribution to the safety debate within the connected and autonomous vehicle (C/AV) industry.

StreetDrone’s 30-page report – available as a free download – is based on the company’s experience in operating AV trials in heavily populated urban environments, explained Mike Potts, chief executive of StreetDrone. 

This experience spans the full spectrum of AV disciplines, from hardware and mechanical design through to artificial intelligence and software, as well as insight into city centre public highway trials.

“For an organisation focused on zone 1 urban trials, we have necessarily been safety-led, so our report encapsulates much of this knowledge,” said Potts. 

“Importantly… we propose a set of rules for the automotive safety factors that address what we consider to be a systemic oversight across the industry of these vital hardware considerations.”

The report also discusses the definition of a safe operating environment, minimum operating standards for safety drivers and a set of open data protocols for effective error tracking and rectification.

StreetDrone, based in Oxford, UK, says it was the first business in Europe to run a public road autonomous trial using open-source self-driving software. 

StreetDrone’s own hardware platforms range from the L7e class Renault Twizy heavy quadricycle to the flexible Nissan eNV200, which comes in taxi, delivery van or 7-seater passenger variants. 

The firm says they all benefit from autonomous-ready technology conversion which includes a proprietary control system that works in parallel with the vehicle’s original control and safety systems in order that all of the safety validation undertaken by the carmaker is maintained.

The StreetDrone platform approach operates upstream of all of these systems and leaves them functionally intact, rather than reverse-engineering or ‘hacking’ existing vehicle control system capabilities, like lane-keeping and power steering.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Geotoll’s payment app could be the smart answer to tolling interoperability
    July 30, 2013
    Jon Masters looks at a smartphone app which could be the ‘disruptive technology’ that eases the way to interoperability in tolling systems. Consumer demand may soon drive the biggest step change yet in tolling. In the United States a new start-up company, Geotoll, has launched a smartphone app for electronic toll payment. It is not beyond possibility that rapid growth of the market for smartphones will continue – an estimated 50% of US citizens and 80% of Europeans now have one – and that the Geotoll brand
  • Ioki heads down AV Avenue
    September 13, 2021
    €22m EU project expected to set course for connected and autonomous mobility in Europe
  • PTV sets its sights on Smart City solutions
    February 9, 2017
    Making a city smarter not only relies on understand technological opportunities but also human decision-making, as Miller Crockart explains. Cities are about people – a fact that can easily be forgotten when experts talk about roads, healthcare and education as though they are abstract and unconnected monoliths rather than things people use. Understanding how and why people use services is vital for making decisions on how they can be optimised for maximum efficiency across inter-connected networks that for
  • Carol Schweiger: "I never looked back"
    January 14, 2025
    Carol Schweiger is a legend of the ITS industry. She talks to Adam Hill about her career, real train sets, equity, AI, quantum computing – and the difficulty of behaviour change