Skip to main content

StreetDrone urges more emphasis on C/AV hardware 

A greater reliance is needed on the contribution hardware can make towards safety within autonomous vehicles (AVs), according to a report by StreetDrone.
By David Arminas April 15, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
StreetDrone's report draws on experience of urban C/AV trials (© Akarat Phasura | Dreamstime.com)

The company, a maker of hardware and software, said the purpose of the Putting Safety First in Autonomous Vehicles report is to make an experience-based contribution to the safety debate within the connected and autonomous vehicle (C/AV) industry.

StreetDrone’s 30-page report – available as a free download – is based on the company’s experience in operating AV trials in heavily populated urban environments, explained Mike Potts, chief executive of StreetDrone. 

This experience spans the full spectrum of AV disciplines, from hardware and mechanical design through to artificial intelligence and software, as well as insight into city centre public highway trials.

“For an organisation focused on zone 1 urban trials, we have necessarily been safety-led, so our report encapsulates much of this knowledge,” said Potts. 

“Importantly… we propose a set of rules for the automotive safety factors that address what we consider to be a systemic oversight across the industry of these vital hardware considerations.”

The report also discusses the definition of a safe operating environment, minimum operating standards for safety drivers and a set of open data protocols for effective error tracking and rectification.

StreetDrone, based in Oxford, UK, says it was the first business in Europe to run a public road autonomous trial using open-source self-driving software. 

StreetDrone’s own hardware platforms range from the L7e class Renault Twizy heavy quadricycle to the flexible Nissan eNV200, which comes in taxi, delivery van or 7-seater passenger variants. 

The firm says they all benefit from autonomous-ready technology conversion which includes a proprietary control system that works in parallel with the vehicle’s original control and safety systems in order that all of the safety validation undertaken by the carmaker is maintained.

The StreetDrone platform approach operates upstream of all of these systems and leaves them functionally intact, rather than reverse-engineering or ‘hacking’ existing vehicle control system capabilities, like lane-keeping and power steering.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Aurrigo seeks partners for AV technology following expansion into Canada
    April 9, 2018
    UK-based Aurrigo has opened an office in Ottawa, Canada, and is seeking academic, industry and government partners to support the development of its autonomous vehicle (AV) technology. The Coventry-headquartered firm believes its four-seater Pod Zero will offer a viable first and last mile transport solution for moving people around key locations. It has already enlisted researchers at Carleton University to facilitate AV trials on its campus and has received critical support from economic development ag
  • Inrix, Big Data & the fine art of anonymity
    January 9, 2025
    How do you protect personal privacy while still allowing data to be of use in intelligent transportation? Ahmed Darrat of Inrix offers some thoughts on finding that balance...
  • Cooperative road infrastructures - progress and the future
    February 1, 2012
    Robert Bertini, deputy administrator of the USDOT's Research and Innovative Technology Administration, discusses the research and deployment paths of cooperative road infrastructures. High-level analysis by the US's National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of the potential of Vehicle-to-Infrastructure/Infrastructure-to-Vehicle (V2I/I2V) and Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) technologies indicates that V2V could in exclusivity address a large proportion of crashes involving unimpaired drivers. In fact,
  • Debating road user charging systems
    January 26, 2012
    Are pre-launch trials of charging systems the way to improve public acceptance? Or is the real key a more robust political attitude? Here, leading system suppliers discuss the issue. The use of distance-based Road User Charging (RUC) is now well established, at least for heavy goods vehicles on strategic roads. However demand management for all vehicles, whether a distance-based charge or some form of cordon scheme, has yet to make significant progress. This is in spite of the logic and equity of RUC being