Skip to main content

StreetDrone urges more emphasis on C/AV hardware 

A greater reliance is needed on the contribution hardware can make towards safety within autonomous vehicles (AVs), according to a report by StreetDrone.
By David Arminas April 15, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
StreetDrone's report draws on experience of urban C/AV trials (© Akarat Phasura | Dreamstime.com)

The company, a maker of hardware and software, said the purpose of the Putting Safety First in Autonomous Vehicles report is to make an experience-based contribution to the safety debate within the connected and autonomous vehicle (C/AV) industry.

StreetDrone’s 30-page report – available as a free download – is based on the company’s experience in operating AV trials in heavily populated urban environments, explained Mike Potts, chief executive of StreetDrone. 

This experience spans the full spectrum of AV disciplines, from hardware and mechanical design through to artificial intelligence and software, as well as insight into city centre public highway trials.

“For an organisation focused on zone 1 urban trials, we have necessarily been safety-led, so our report encapsulates much of this knowledge,” said Potts. 

“Importantly… we propose a set of rules for the automotive safety factors that address what we consider to be a systemic oversight across the industry of these vital hardware considerations.”

The report also discusses the definition of a safe operating environment, minimum operating standards for safety drivers and a set of open data protocols for effective error tracking and rectification.

StreetDrone, based in Oxford, UK, says it was the first business in Europe to run a public road autonomous trial using open-source self-driving software. 

StreetDrone’s own hardware platforms range from the L7e class Renault Twizy heavy quadricycle to the flexible Nissan eNV200, which comes in taxi, delivery van or 7-seater passenger variants. 

The firm says they all benefit from autonomous-ready technology conversion which includes a proprietary control system that works in parallel with the vehicle’s original control and safety systems in order that all of the safety validation undertaken by the carmaker is maintained.

The StreetDrone platform approach operates upstream of all of these systems and leaves them functionally intact, rather than reverse-engineering or ‘hacking’ existing vehicle control system capabilities, like lane-keeping and power steering.

Related Content

  • Smoothing out city freight movements
    May 28, 2014
    David Crawford welcomes a national first. Urban freight movements, while commercially and socially vital, are a growing logistical headache for planners and people alike. Figures from France’s Lyon Laboratory of Transport Economics indicate that goods transport in major urban areas accounts for: 20% of traffic; 35% of CO2 emissions made by all urban trips; and 50% of the diesel used; while final km delivery runs account for 20% of the total cost of the transport chain.
  • Transport Systems Catapult boss: ‘We can’t build our way out of congestion’
    March 4, 2019
    The UK Transport Systems Catapult’s CEO Paul Campion talks to Colin Sowman about helping companies develop tomorrow’s solutions – and explains why you can never build your way to empty roads The future of mobility is going to be driven by services.” That’s the opening position of Paul Campion, CEO of the Transport Systems Catapult (TSC) – the UK government organisation set up to help boost transport-related employment and the economy. Campion was previously with IBM and describes himself as a ‘techno o
  • Last call for first AV to Michigan Central
    April 12, 2024
    Detroit's redeveloped railway station will be one of stops on new AV route in city
  • Taking the long view of ITS
    March 24, 2015
    Caroline Visser believes the ITS industry must present a coherent case for consideration of the technology to become part of transport policy and planning. As ITS advisor and road finance director for the International Road Federation (IRF) in Geneva, Caroline Visser is well placed to evaluate quantifying the benefits of ITS implementation – a topic about which there is little agreement and even less consistency. She is pressing to get some consistency in the evaluation of ITS deployments through the use of