Skip to main content

NJ Transit links with Uber and Lyft

Access Link Riders’ Choice Pilot Program will see ride-hail used for paratransit
By Adam Hill May 25, 2023 Read time: 2 mins
Using Uber or Lyft for paratransit will be 'based upon the best available scheduling option' (© Jonathan Weiss | Dreamstime.com)

NJ Transit is piloting ride-hail on its paratransit service Access Link.

The New Jersey transportation agency is allowing users to opt in - on a voluntary basis - to taking trips with Uber and Lyft "to reduce wait and trip times while maintaining Access Link prices and the reservation process to which customers are accustomed".

The Access Link Riders’ Choice Pilot Program will improve the service's reliability "while offering additional transportation options to customers of this crucial service", says New Jersey DoT commissioner and NJ Transit board chair Diane Gutierrez-Scaccetti.

Before scheduling a trip, riders must update their profile to indicate which ride-share service they want to use - or whether they have no preference.

They will not need to use the Uber or Lyft apps or contact either company directly, and the decision to send a ride-hail vehicle will be "based upon the best available scheduling option".

"NJ Transit strives to provide efficient and reliable transportation services to all of our customers, particularly those who are the most vulnerable,” Gutierrez-Scaccetti adds.

NJ Transit is the US's largest state-wide public transportation system providing more than 925,000 weekday trips on 253 bus routes, three light rail lines and 12 commuter rail lines, as well as Access Link.

Zach Greenberger, chief business officer at Lyft, says: “Through similar partnerships across the US, we have seen riders benefit from decreased wait times, improved reliability and convenience, which ensures they can get to and from work, school, appointments, and other activities.”

Customers who do not opt in will continue to have all of their trips serviced by the current Access Link providers but NJ Transit believes that the new scheme will improve on-time performance and productivity, decrease missed trips and also improve retention of Access Link drivers.

The pilot runs in Regions 2 and 5, which include Essex, Morris, Union, Somerset, Burlington, Camden, Gloucester and Salem counties and parts of Cumberland County and may expand to additional counties statewide.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Transit’s Covid clean-up operation
    August 24, 2021
    The onset of Covid-19 saw ridership on public transport slump drastically. How will the organisations that provide these essential services persuade customers back on board?
  • The art of road safety
    June 10, 2022
    Saving lives on the road surely can’t be as easy as painting the town red – and pink, green and yellow? Or purple and blue? Can it? Adam Hill has a brush with Bloomberg Philanthropies
  • Alliance stages North American back office interoperability trial
    December 4, 2013
    JJ Eden, President and CEO of the Alliance for Toll Interoperability, talks to Jason Barnes about the new inter-agency hub, which will facilitate national transactions When it comes to achieving interoperability, the sheer diversity of technologies in operation in the US is perhaps the tolling industry’s greatest defining characteristic and its biggest challenge. The situation is in stark contrast with some other regions of the world, such as Europe where the use of common front-end Dedicated Short-Range
  • Court rules former Uber driver was an employee
    September 11, 2015
    Ride-hailing company Uber has lost another legal round in the dispute over whether its drivers are independent contractors or employees, an issue that threatens the core of the ride-hailing company's business model, says Reuters. The California Employment Development Department (EDD) recently determined that a former Uber driver in Southern California was an employee, not an independent contractor as the company has claimed and as such was entitled to employee benefits. The decision was upheld twice on a