Skip to main content

GTT bolsters solutions with GNSS

Opticom solutions cover transit signal priority and traffic sensing technology
By Ben Spencer January 7, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
GTT says GNSS gives customers across to multiple satellite networks (© Andrey Armyagov | Dreamstime.com)

Global Traffic Technologies (GTT) has added the Global Navigation Satellites System (GNSS) to its Opticom solutions to improve the reliability of connected vehicle services. 

GTT says this collection of satellites transmits positioning and timing data to GNSS receivers, which use this data to determine location.

Connected vehicle applications rely on GPS to determine the real-time location of vehicles.

GTT describes GPS as a single system that employs 31 satellites compared to GNSS which utilises around the world, including GPS (America), Glonass (Russia), Galileo (European Union) and BeiDou (China).

According to GTT, adding GNSS will enable more reliable priority control in dense urban areas with obstructions such as bridges, tunnels and tall buildings.

It will also reduce performance issues that can diminish priority control's effectiveness by helping ensure the correct intersection receives the request for a green light as priority vehicles approach intersections, the company adds. 

GTT insists better location services will minimise disruptions to traffic and help bus drivers and light rail train conductors navigate dense urban areas in safer and faster.

Ravi Shah, GTT vice president of product development, says: “It’s well-documented that urban canyons and multipath effects can negatively impact the accuracy and overall performance of GPS-based locating."

"The advantage of adding GNSS is that it gives our customers access to multiple satellite networks, thereby reducing interference and increasing accuracy while providing reliable redundancy and availability.”

Despite this, the company recognises that communication to these satellites can be lost temporarily in areas with tall buildings, tunnels or multi-level roads. 

GTT has therefore added the ability to more effectively determine vehicle position in these areas with software-based dead reckoning. 

If satellite communication is lost, dead reckoning is expected to calculate a moving vehicle's position by estimating its direction and distance travelled from its last known geo-location.

GTT’s software-based dead reckoning solution functions with sensors built into the Opticom devices, with no additional vehicle wiring required.

Chad Mack, GTT’s director of product management, says: “Opticom, like other connected-vehicle applications, relies on accurate vehicle position to deliver high performance solutions.”

GTT says on its website that its Opticom solutions can provide intelligent transit signal priority for public transit and flexible traffic sensing technology for a variety of traffic applications. 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Geely flies high with China AV satellites
    March 5, 2021
    Geely expects to start launching this year for autonomous vehicles and V2X comms
  • GTT to highlight emergency vehicle pre-emption at EMS2017 Copenhagen
    May 8, 2017
    Global Traffic Technologies (GTT) will demonstrate its Opticom emergency vehicle pre-emption (EVP) system at the Emergency Medical Services Congress’ EMS2017 event in Copenhagen later this month, to show how effectively Opticom can help speed first responders to or from the scene of an incident, avoiding the danger of evading cross-traffic and the delay of manoeuvring past vehicles stopped for a red light. Opticom provides drivers of emergency vehicles with priority control that enables green lights during
  • Where is tolling tech taking us?
    September 25, 2019
    From DSRC and RFID to GNSS or smartphones – which technology is ‘best’ for tolls, charging and pricing schemes? In the first of two articles, Josef Czako examines the options
  • Improving the positional accuracy of GNSS road user charging
    July 23, 2012
    The European GINA project is intended to address and overcome many of the institutional, technical and public acceptance hurdles currently faced by satellite-based road user charging schemes. Dave Tindall and Denis Naberezhnykh, TRL, and Laure Dezes, ERF, write. Pay-as-you-drive Road User Charging (RUC), whereby demand (or congestion) is managed by applying appropriate tariffs in order to encourage drivers to make their journeys at less busy times, on less congested routes or even on different modes, could