Skip to main content

Distraction danger rises with in-car tech, says TRL

The increasing sophistication of in-car technology is creating new dangers in terms of driver distraction, a new study finds.
By Mike Woof April 2, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Driver concentration is an issue with systems such as Apple CarPlay, TRL finds (© Allard1 | Dreamstime.com)

The study, undertaken by TRL on behalf of IAM RoadSmart, the FIA and the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund, aimed to evaluate the impact on driving performance of using in-vehicle infotainment systems such as Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. 

The research explored both voice and touch control, with both found to distract drivers – though touch control proved the more distracting of the two, making driver reactions even worse than when texting while driving.

Reaction times at motorway speeds increased average stopping distances to between four and five car lengths - and drivers took their eyes off the road for as long as 16 seconds while driving, the study found.

The results revealed that participants’ reaction times when engaging with either system were over 50% slower than normal. Stopping distances, lane control and response to external stimuli were all impaired.

Significantly, the participants’ reaction times were slower than someone who had used cannabis and five times worse than someone driving at the legal limit of alcohol consumption.

Neil Greig, IAM RoadSmart's policy and research director, says: “While previous research indicates that Apple CarPlay and Android Auto perform better than more traditional buttons and controls, the results from this latest study raise some serious concerns about the development and use of the latest in-vehicle infotainment systems."

"Anything that distracts a driver’s eyes or mind from the road is bad news for road safety. We’re now calling on industry and government to openly test and approve such systems and develop consistent standards that genuinely help minimise driver distraction.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Don’t look at the jigsaw pieces – see the whole puzzle, says CCTA
    February 19, 2024
    There are three main barriers to taking transport ideas from the pilot stage to real-life usage: incompatible technology, local control and limited funding. Tim Haile of California’s Contra Costa Transportation Authority has some thoughts on how to overcome them
  • Independent tests reveal floating car data is ‘as accurate as road sensors’
    October 12, 2015
    An independent quality test by the German State of Bavaria’s Centre for Traffic Management (ZVM) has found that floating car data (FCD) from INRIX is ‘just as good’ as the information from road sensors. The results indicate that the traffic authority can provide enhanced traffic information to citizens without the expense and time-consuming process of maintaining and installing additional road sensors. ZVM selected Inrix to provide data and insights to reduce congestion across the state and commissioned
  • ASECAP examines tolling during downturns
    September 22, 2014
    ASECAP debated the impact of the financial crises on Europe’s tolling companies and considered the future in diverse economies. Colin Sowman picks some of the highlights. This year ASECAP (Association Europeenne des Concessionnaires d’Autoroutes et d’Ouvrages a’ Peage, with members in 21 countries managing 46,000km of roadway) held its annual Study & Information Days in Athens, Greece – one of the country hardest hit by recent economic problems. While the theme of the conference, Ensuring Sustainability in
  • Subtle differences
    February 27, 2012
    Too often, when I sit down to write one of these forewords, I worry that things are becoming a little circular.