Skip to main content

Uber files LADoT lawsuit over Jump data

Uber, owner of the Jump bike-share brand, has filed a lawsuit against the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADoT) to contest what it calls the unlawful implementation of the Mobility Data Specification (MDS).
By Ben Spencer April 1, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Uber is unhappy over what it sees as a threat to Jump riders' privacy

In a blog post on M, Uber's chief privacy officer Ruby Zefo says MDS allows the city to access and collect the location coordinates of Jump riders in real-time, putting their privacy at risk.
 
The move comes a month after Uber's decision to join the Communities Against Rider Surveillance group to raise awareness of how MDS can be used by local governments to track personal movements through a city.

Uber says Jump shares data to support safe operations of dockless mobility programmes in cities while also helping them make sure permit requirements are met.
 
“However, we remain concerned about LADoT’s demand for data about individual riders, including where they begin their trip, where and when they arrive, which route they take and any stop they make along the way,” Zefo continues. “This highly personal information, shared in real time with government agencies, signifies a decisive step towards the continuous, unregulated surveillance of our users.”
 
She bolsters Uber's stance by referring to an analysis carried out by California's Legislative Counsel Bureau which looked into whether such data could violate the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (Calecpa).
 
“The Calecpa restricts a department of a city or country from requiring a business that rents dockless scooters or other shared mobility devices to the public to provide the department with real-time location data from its dockless shared mobility devices as a condition of granting a permit to operate in the department's jurisdiction,” the bureau concluded.
 
Zefo emphasises that Uber supports building a data sharing standard that can serve all cities “without jeopardising privacy”.
 
“Filing this lawsuit is an unfortunate, but necessary, step towards understanding how we can build standards and policies together that facilitate the exchange of mobility data while respecting the guardrails of consumer privacy and Constitutional rights,” Zefo concludes.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Monitoring and transparency preserve enforcement's reputation
    July 30, 2012
    What can be done to preserve automated enforcement's reputation in the face of media and public criticism? Here, system manufacturers and suppliers talk about what they think are the most appropriate business models. Recent events in Italy only served to once again to push automated enforcement into the media spotlight. At the heart of the matter were the numerous alleged instances of local authorities and their contract suppliers of enforcement services colluding to illegally shorten amber signal phase tim
  • 15-minute cities versus tinfoil hat wearers: only one winner in this fight
    April 19, 2023
    Tinfoil hat wearers – conspiracy theorists who delight in joining non-existent dots – are doing their best to make the 15-minute city concept toxic. It’s wonderful that they’re doomed to fail
  • ‘Quarter of crashes’ caused by distraction, says FIA Region 2
    September 13, 2019
    FIA Region 2 has warned that a driver only has to be distracted for two seconds to cause a crash. The FIA’s data suggests that to 25% of road crashes are due to distraction, with up to 30% of total driving time spent on distracting activities. Commissioner Violetta Bulc, European Commissioner for Transport, recently warned against distraction caused by using mobile phones. She said: “Distraction from mobile devices has become one of the top crash factors. Reports show it has even overtaken speed and alc
  • Scoot expands fleet to include electric bikes in San Francisco
    January 3, 2018
    Provider of shared light electric vehicle (LEV) services Scoot Networks (Scoot) has added a full fleet of electric bicycles (e-bikes) to its service to meet the needs of residents in San Francisco who are seeking more affordable and valuable transit options. Users can access the bicycles via the same app used for Scoot’s shared electric scooters. The e-bikes come with an electric motor to make pedalling easier for terrains such as hills, but riders are required to pedal to reach the maximum speed of 20mph.